discussion of kacma fi noda: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
|||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
See also [[camera obscura|camera obscura]]. | |||
* [[Pierre Abbat|phma]]: | |||
That should be ''kacma fi zi'o''; anything (such as a tree) which has nothing to record images on ''kacma fi noda''. | ** That should be '''kacma fi zi'o'''; anything (such as a tree) which has nothing to record images on '''kacma fi noda'''. | ||
*** [[jezrax|jezrax:]] | |||
* ''kacma fi zi'o'' is good (I almost chose it); it means something like | **** '''kacma fi zi'o''' is good (I almost chose it); it means something like ''camera for which any recording medium is irrelevant'', which is true for a camera obscura. '''kacma fi noda''' means something like ''camera which does not record on any medium'', which I think is also good. I don't accept that '''lo'e tricu cu kacma fi noda'''. A [[gismu|gismu]] is not defined by its places only, but by its entire definition. Both '''kacma fi zi'o''' and '''kacma fi noda''' rely on the listener accepting that a camera obscura is just like a familiar photographic '''kacma''' except for an unusual treatment of the x3 place; I think both suggested unusual treatments work. | ||
** phma is right. A ''kacma be fi noda'' is not ''lo kacma'', just as a ''dunda be noda'' is not ''lo dunda''. So it doesn't make much sense to insist that a ''kacma be fi [[noda|noda]]'' should still be something we consider a camera. | *** phma is right. A '''kacma be fi noda''' is not '''lo kacma''', just as a '''dunda be noda''' is not '''lo dunda'''. So it doesn't make much sense to insist that a '''kacma be fi [[noda|noda]]''' should still be something we consider a camera. | ||
**** [[jezrax|jezrax:]] | |||
*** Reference, please. | ***** Reference, please. | ||
**** Do you accept ''lo'e tricu na kacma fi da''? It means exactly the same as ''lo'e tricu cu kacma fi noda''. | ****** [[User:xorxes|xorxes:]] | ||
******* Do you accept '''lo'e tricu na kacma fi da'''? It means exactly the same as '''lo'e tricu cu kacma fi noda'''. | |||
***** What you choose to consider a "camera" is your own problem. pe'i la jezrax cu prije jimpe | ******** [[User:xod|la xod:]] | ||
***** Of course. When I say ''lo'e tricu cu kamca fi noda'', I'm saying that a tree is '''not''' a camera. | ********* What you choose to consider a "camera" is your own problem. '''pe'i la jezrax cu prije jimpe''' | ||
********** [[User:xorxes|xorxes:]] | |||
** Another way to say it is ''kacma fi lo nomei'', which means that it is a camera but its recording medium is nothing. A camera with film ''kacma fi zi'o gi'enai kacma fi lo nomei''. | *********** Of course. When I say ''lo'e tricu cu kamca fi noda'', I'm saying that a tree is '''not''' a camera. | ||
*** Right. It is important to keep the meanings of ''noda'' and ''lo nomei'' appart. They're two significantly different "nothings". | *** [[Pierre Abbat|phma:]] | ||
**** Another way to say it is '''kacma fi lo nomei''', which means that it is a camera but its recording medium is nothing. A camera with film '''kacma fi zi'o gi'enai kacma fi lo nomei'''. | |||
***** [[User:xorxes|xorxes:]] | |||
****** Right. It is important to keep the meanings of '''noda''' and '''lo nomei''' appart. They're two significantly different "nothings". |
Latest revision as of 08:47, 3 October 2014
See also camera obscura.
- phma:
- That should be kacma fi zi'o; anything (such as a tree) which has nothing to record images on kacma fi noda.
- jezrax:
- kacma fi zi'o is good (I almost chose it); it means something like camera for which any recording medium is irrelevant, which is true for a camera obscura. kacma fi noda means something like camera which does not record on any medium, which I think is also good. I don't accept that lo'e tricu cu kacma fi noda. A gismu is not defined by its places only, but by its entire definition. Both kacma fi zi'o and kacma fi noda rely on the listener accepting that a camera obscura is just like a familiar photographic kacma except for an unusual treatment of the x3 place; I think both suggested unusual treatments work.
- phma is right. A kacma be fi noda is not lo kacma, just as a dunda be noda is not lo dunda. So it doesn't make much sense to insist that a kacma be fi noda should still be something we consider a camera.
- phma:
- Another way to say it is kacma fi lo nomei, which means that it is a camera but its recording medium is nothing. A camera with film kacma fi zi'o gi'enai kacma fi lo nomei.
- xorxes:
- Right. It is important to keep the meanings of noda and lo nomei appart. They're two significantly different "nothings".
- xorxes:
- Another way to say it is kacma fi lo nomei, which means that it is a camera but its recording medium is nothing. A camera with film kacma fi zi'o gi'enai kacma fi lo nomei.
- jezrax:
- That should be kacma fi zi'o; anything (such as a tree) which has nothing to record images on kacma fi noda.