Talk:Lojval

Posted by namor on Sat 10 of May, 2008 21:35 GMT posts: 42 The script doesn't find words you already learned in the Pauker-Vocabulary-File, so it adds them again as unlearned. :-\ (This is because the Pauker Software adds a timestamp when the Voc. has been learned, so the 'stupid search routine' doesn't recognize the Voc. anymore as the one we've just searched for.)

I made a rather dirty fix on this.:

simply replace (line 163 or so): CODE if card_search_term in lojbancards: print "\nThat card is already in your flashcard deck." return

/CODEwith:CODE

card_search_term = """%s

%s

""" % (front, back)

if card_search_term in lojbancards: print "\nThat card is already in your flashcard deck." return

/CODE

As you can see, this simply doesn't search for the first line of the xml-entry, which contains the timestamp. Quick and dirty, but it works. :-)

Best regards, namor

> Use this thread to discuss the page:: Lojval

Score: 0.00 Vote: 1 2 3 4 5 top of page Reply

Edit  Delete  Report this post	

Aw: File uploaded

Posted by namor on Sat 10 of May, 2008 21:53 GMT posts: 42 Apparently the listserver ate most of the inline fix, so I uploaded the fixed lojval.py file to the wiki.

Best regards, Namor

> Use this thread to discuss the page:: Lojval

Score: 0.00 Vote: 1 2 3 4 5 top of page Reply

Edit  Delete  Report this post	

Lojval

Posted by namor on Sun 11 of May, 2008 07:25 GMT posts: 42 Apparently the listserver ate most of the inline fix, so I uploaded the fixed lojval.py file to the wiki.

Best regards, Namor

Am Samstag 10 Mai 2008 23:35:27 schrieb namor: > Aw: Lojval error with Pauker FIX included > > Author: namor > > The script doesn't find words you already learned in the > Pauker-Vocabulary-File, so it adds them again as unlearned. :-\ (This is > because the Pauker Software adds a timestamp when the Voc. has been > learned, so the 'stupid search routine' doesn't recognize the Voc. anymore > as the one we've just searched for.) > > I made a rather dirty fix on this.: > > simply replace (line 163 or so): CODE > if card_search_term in lojbancards: > print "\nThat card is already in your flashcard deck." > return > > /CODEwith:CODE > > card_search_term = """%s > > > > %s > > > """ % (front, back) > > if card_search_term in lojbancards: > print "\nThat card is already in your flashcard deck." > return > > /CODE > > As you can see, this simply doesn't search for the first line of the > xml-entry, which contains the timestamp. Quick and dirty, but it works. :-) > > Best regards, > namor > > > Use this thread to discuss the page:: Lojval