the Difference Between Logical and Non-Logical Connectives: Difference between revisions

From Lojban
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (Text replace - "{CODE(wrap="1]]" to "<code>")
 
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<code>[20:07] <vensa> Question: how come there are a seperate set of logical connectives for sumti and tanru (eks and jeks), yet the same *non-logical* connective can be used with sumti and tanru?


<code>[[jbocre: 20:07]] <vensa> Question: how come there are a seperate set of logical connectives for sumti and tanru (eks and jeks), yet the same *non-logical* connective can be used with sumti and tanru?
[20:08] <rlpowell> yacc deficiencies.


[[jbocre: 20:08]] <rlpowell> yacc deficiencies.
[20:08] <rlpowell> When you use the non-logical connectives with sumti in the official parser or jbofihe, you have to terminate the sumti.


[[jbocre: 20:08]] <rlpowell> When you use the non-logical connectives with sumti in the official parser or jbofihe, you have to terminate the sumti.
[20:09] <rlpowell> An obviously unacceptable thing for something like {.e}


[[jbocre: 20:09]] <rlpowell> An obviously unacceptable thing for something like {.e}
[20:09] <vensa> .y


[[jbocre: 20:09]] <vensa> .y
[20:09] <vensa> I dont get it?


[[jbocre: 20:09]] <vensa> I dont get it?
[20:09] <rlpowell> Which part?


[[jbocre: 20:09]] <rlpowell> Which part?
[20:09] <vensa> why is it *obviously* unacceptable?


[[jbocre: 20:09]] <vensa> why is it *obviously* unacceptable?
[20:10] <rlpowell> To have to say {le klama ku .e ...} ?


[[jbocre: 20:10]] <rlpowell> To have to say {le klama ku .e ...} ?
[20:10] <vensa> becuz it's used more often?


[[jbocre: 20:10]] <vensa> becuz it's used more often?
[20:11] <selpa`i> Hi


[[jbocre: 20:11]] <selpa`i> Hi
[20:11] <rlpowell> it's used all over the place, yes.


[[jbocre: 20:11]] <rlpowell> it's used all over the place, yes.
[20:11] <rlpowell> It's a bad place to waste syllables.


[[jbocre: 20:11]] <rlpowell> It's a bad place to waste syllables.
[20:11] <vensa> I understand


[[jbocre: 20:11]] <vensa> I understand
[20:11] <vensa> coi selpa'i


[[jbocre: 20:11]] <vensa> coi selpa'i
[20:11] <rlpowell> It gets worse when it's a {le nu} or something.</code>
 
[[jbocre: 20:11]] <rlpowell> It gets worse when it's a {le nu} or something.</code>

Latest revision as of 08:35, 30 June 2014

[20:07] <vensa> Question: how come there are a seperate set of logical connectives for sumti and tanru (eks and jeks), yet the same *non-logical* connective can be used with sumti and tanru?

[20:08] <rlpowell> yacc deficiencies.

[20:08] <rlpowell> When you use the non-logical connectives with sumti in the official parser or jbofihe, you have to terminate the sumti.

[20:09] <rlpowell> An obviously unacceptable thing for something like {.e}

[20:09] <vensa> .y

[20:09] <vensa> I dont get it?

[20:09] <rlpowell> Which part?

[20:09] <vensa> why is it *obviously* unacceptable?

[20:10] <rlpowell> To have to say {le klama ku .e ...} ?

[20:10] <vensa> becuz it's used more often?

[20:11] <selpa`i> Hi

[20:11] <rlpowell> it's used all over the place, yes.

[20:11] <rlpowell> It's a bad place to waste syllables.

[20:11] <vensa> I understand

[20:11] <vensa> coi selpa'i

[20:11] <rlpowell> It gets worse when it's a {le nu} or something.