lojbo prenu: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
m (Text replace - "jbocre: t" to "t") |
||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
***''javnakai'' is a type-4 fu'ivla. ''ta vlakai'' means "that has wordness". | ***''javnakai'' is a type-4 fu'ivla. ''ta vlakai'' means "that has wordness". | ||
**** I did not invent these lujvo, and they are both bad. javnakai should be javnikai, and tavlakai falis the [[ | **** I did not invent these lujvo, and they are both bad. javnakai should be javnikai, and tavlakai falis the [[tosmabru test|tosmabru test]]. But they are used. Uh-oh. | ||
**** Sorry, just rechecked where they first popped up. All that over nothing: It's javnykai and tavlykai. | **** Sorry, just rechecked where they first popped up. All that over nothing: It's javnykai and tavlykai. |
Revision as of 11:51, 23 March 2014
- .i .ui mi nelci cuxna zoi my. long tanru .my.
- Me too, but there are certain lujvo that have gained enough of a meaning that they are recommended in daily use. I do not even know what kai is a rafsi for, though I use the words javnakai and tavlakai. You won't find anyone saying bridi valsi or se cmavo - only brivla and selma'o.
- javnakai is a type-4 fu'ivla. ta vlakai means "that has wordness".
- I did not invent these lujvo, and they are both bad. javnakai should be javnikai, and tavlakai falis the tosmabru test. But they are used. Uh-oh.
- javnakai is a type-4 fu'ivla. ta vlakai means "that has wordness".
- Sorry, just rechecked where they first popped up. All that over nothing: It's javnykai and tavlykai.
- kai is a rafsi for ckaji, which means to have a property, since everything which has a given property has that property, -kai doesn't change the meaning. (mi na tugni di'u Well, what's the difference then?) Use something like -smi, -(sel)te'i, or -cfu.
- ma ckajykai