evgeny Sklyanin: Difference between revisions

From Lojban
Jump to navigation Jump to search
mNo edit summary
 
mNo edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:


A grammar which rules do not depend on the context during parsing. I know, this is a circular definition.
Evgeny Sklyanin, alias [[jbocre: evgenis evgenis.|evgenis evgenis.]]


Here are some examples :
I was born in Leningrad, USSR (now St.Petersburg, Russia). Now I live in England and teach mathematics at the University of York.


* Lojban's grammar, and more generally any [[jbocre: LR|LR]] or [[jbocre: LL|LL]] grammar, are context-free.
My main lojbanic activity is translating of Lojban materials into Russian and maintaining the web sites


* The C language is supposed to be context-free, except on the topic of type definition (if "typedef" preceeds a definition, the symbol defined becomes a type rather than a variable : semantics change depending on the context, given the same lexical grammar).
[[jbocre: l|lojban.narod.ru]]
** C is fairly good about it, compared to many other languages.


* English is not context-free. The way we parse/understand sentences depends on the context, either past or future. Consider this text :
[http://members.lycos.co.uk/lojbanlinks/ ojbanlinks]
 
you if sense makes sentence this, please read the first six words backwards.
 
*''mi'e cein. Doesn't Lojban have si/sa/su, which must be "understood" by the parser in the same sense as the English example above in order to be correctly parsed?''
** maybe this doesn't address what you mean -- but si/sa/su can be implemented below actual language parsing, simsa things such as \ line continuations in C.
 
** they are trivially handled by the lexer.
*But this sentence isn't legitimate English...
 
** arguable; but the point still stands -- english isn't context free.  A phrase structure grammar for english would be hideously large and type 0-1, if a complete one were ever made, which is unlikely.  --mi'e .djorden.
 
----
 
I thought a CFG was one where the left side of the rewrite rule is unconditional. E.g. "A -> B C" is context free, but "A -> B C, when A is preceded by D" ("D A -> B C") is not context free. --[[User:And Rosta|And Rosta]]
 
Fairly sure that is the case. It would certainly be context. --[[jbocre: Jay Kominek|Jay]]
 
the above is correct -- a context free grammar may only have one non terminal on the left hand side of its rules.  --mi'e .djorden.

Revision as of 16:48, 4 November 2013

Evgeny Sklyanin, alias evgenis evgenis.

I was born in Leningrad, USSR (now St.Petersburg, Russia). Now I live in England and teach mathematics at the University of York.

My main lojbanic activity is translating of Lojban materials into Russian and maintaining the web sites

lojban.narod.ru

ojbanlinks