borrowing words: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (Text replace - "jbocre: ([L-Z])" to "$1") |
m (Text replace - "jbocre: ([A-K])" to "$1") |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
In day-to-day use, such borrowing can be and in fact already are ''ad hoc'', without much damage being done -- mainly because all Lojbanists currently share English as a source of loans. For consistency and respectability, however, it is desirable to have canonical loan word forms, both in transliteration and in morphology, for inclusion in a Lojban dictionary. | In day-to-day use, such borrowing can be and in fact already are ''ad hoc'', without much damage being done -- mainly because all Lojbanists currently share English as a source of loans. For consistency and respectability, however, it is desirable to have canonical loan word forms, both in transliteration and in morphology, for inclusion in a Lojban dictionary. | ||
*[[ | *[[IPA to Lojban Mapping|IPA to Lojban Mapping]] | ||
**The [[jbocre: refgram|refgram]] gives a [http://www.lojban.org/files/reference-grammar/chap3.html#s2 ojban to IPA Mapping], which should serve as the basis for any such proposal. | **The [[jbocre: refgram|refgram]] gives a [http://www.lojban.org/files/reference-grammar/chap3.html#s2 ojban to IPA Mapping], which should serve as the basis for any such proposal. | ||
Revision as of 14:53, 23 March 2014
Words are borrowed into Lojban as fu'ivla.
In day-to-day use, such borrowing can be and in fact already are ad hoc, without much damage being done -- mainly because all Lojbanists currently share English as a source of loans. For consistency and respectability, however, it is desirable to have canonical loan word forms, both in transliteration and in morphology, for inclusion in a Lojban dictionary.
- IPA to Lojban Mapping
- The refgram gives a ojban to IPA Mapping, which should serve as the basis for any such proposal.