anglo-centrism: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (Gleki moved page jbocre: Anglo-centrism to Anglo-centrism without leaving a redirect: Text replace - "jbocre: A" to "A") |
m (Conversion script moved page Anglo-centrism to anglo-centrism: Converting page titles to lowercase) |
||
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Lojban is a language developed and used (so far) almost exclusively by anglophones. What does this mean for its success and usefulness as a culturally-neutral ``universal'' language? | Lojban is a language developed and used (so far) almost exclusively by anglophones. What does this mean for its success and usefulness as a culturally-neutral ``universal'' language? | ||
In itself... nothing. ''mi'e [[ | In itself... nothing. ''mi'e [[jezrax|jezrax]]'' | ||
---- | ---- |
Latest revision as of 08:08, 30 June 2014
Lojban is a language developed and used (so far) almost exclusively by anglophones. What does this mean for its success and usefulness as a culturally-neutral ``universal language?
In itself... nothing. mi'e jezrax
We'll need non-Anglos to tell us. So far they haven't complained too much.
Damned, ;-) I did! -- mi'e .aulun.