⟨jai'a⟩ and ⟨nai'a⟩
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
- I've been looking for ways to say these without using experimental cmavo. But in the meantime these provide a stopgap.
p | FALSE SORTA TRUE |
na p | TRUE SORTA FALSE |
ja'a p | FALSE SORTA TRUE |
nai'a p | TRUE FALSE FALSE |
jai'a p | FALSE FALSE TRUE |
- And:
- la xorxes has suggested that, following the pattern of JAhA + CAI, the paradigm should be completed thus:
- And:
- These are operators, functions from truth values to truth values: they read more or less like this (being placed before the core bridi):
na | it is not the case that |
ja'a | it is the case that |
na'a | it is false that |
jai'a | it is true that |
nacu'i | it is indeterminate that |
- Missing from this is it is sorta the case that: SORTA TRUE SORTA (or FALSE TRUE SORTA).
- And:
- I didn't propose those because I can't get my head round the difference from F-T-F. A full series of operators are proposed under Three-value logic (though it is incompatible with the JAhA + CAI proposal assumed by the proposal above). But the ones on this page are the ones I personally would find usable and useful.
- And:
- Missing from this is it is sorta the case that: SORTA TRUE SORTA (or FALSE TRUE SORTA).