Search results

Jump to navigation Jump to search
  • What's wrong with u'u? Why does it need to be COI and not UI? > What's wrong with u'u? Why does it need to be COI and not UI?
    19 KB (3,084 words) - 08:59, 26 January 2015
  • Eliminate selma'o GAhO and move its members to UI. > Eliminate selma'o GAhO and move its members to UI.
    26 KB (4,434 words) - 09:44, 26 January 2015
  • ...o in Lojban is a perennial problem. To say that ''.ui'' belongs to selma'o UI, you can try * zo .ui cmavo la'e zo .ui
    3 KB (553 words) - 08:42, 24 March 2014
  • :'''ui ja'ai''' — ''Yay indeed!'' :'''ui i ui nai''' — ''Yay! Alas!''
    39 KB (6,105 words) - 10:30, 23 November 2015
  • === UI types === Ideally illocutionary operators would not be in UI, since they are a variety of predicate. At any rate, they are sensistive to
    26 KB (4,521 words) - 05:21, 15 February 2015
  • :'''.ui la djan klama''' ...the other kinds of indicators described in this chapter, belong to selma'o UI.
    95 KB (15,305 words) - 08:18, 1 July 2014
  • |'''ui''' ...et de les empêcher de former une <u>diphtongue</u>. Par exemple, «&nbsp;'''ui'''&nbsp;» est normalement prononcé comme «&nbsp;<u>oui</u>&nbsp;», mais
    283 KB (48,687 words) - 07:26, 16 June 2021
  • ;'''re'e cu'i''' (UI*4): Emotion category/modifier: secular. Indicates that the preceding atti ;'''re'e nai''' (UI*4): Emotion category/modifier: sacrilegious. Indicates that the preceding
    13 KB (1,843 words) - 22:27, 3 April 2020
  • *'''ui''' = 簡單情緒指示詞:開心-不開心
    204 KB (7,916 words) - 11:52, 1 September 2020
  • :{{jbo|ni'oni'o}} does not affect indicators (of selma'o UI) or tense references, but :{{s|UI}}
    72 KB (10,781 words) - 08:17, 1 July 2014
  • | style="background-color:#fdefda;" | UI ([http://guskant.github.io/gerna_cipra/zantufa-0.2.html 0.2]) | style="background-color:#fdefda;" | UI ([http://guskant.github.io/gerna_cipra/zantufa-0.5.html 0.5])
    17 KB (2,162 words) - 12:03, 8 June 2016
  • |ui |ui i
    133 KB (20,675 words) - 11:57, 11 February 2016
  • ...d cmene. Syllable breaks after ai, au, ei, oi, ia, ie, ii, io, iu, ua, ue, ui, uo, uu or a single vowel. Special cmavo: Cy, y'y, y = yy = yyy = yyyy = .. > ii, io, iu, ua, ue, ui, uo, uu or a single vowel.
    164 KB (25,843 words) - 12:46, 26 January 2015
  • The great majority of (if not all) UIs work like that. When the UI is at the beginning of the bridi, there is no special focus (or the focus i It would seem then that for simple subordination the rule is that the UI has scope over the immediate bridi. We don't want {la'a}/{xu}/{ei} to apply
    19 KB (3,564 words) - 12:13, 23 March 2014
  • ...that marks for actuality, maybe there is one already. Then mu'ei and that UI would cover all cases, I think. ...that marks for actuality, maybe there is one already. Then mu'ei and that UI would cover all cases, I think.
    90 KB (15,149 words) - 06:55, 23 July 2014
  • ; '''ui''' : "we" (ウィ) ''[注:ia,ie,iu,ioはひらがなのヤ行にあたります。ua,ue,uo,uiはワ行(わ、うぇ、うぉ、うぃ)にあたります。]''
    261 KB (8,203 words) - 08:59, 4 December 2016
  • .ui ...definitions of {.a'e nai} and {ui nai} are listed as being for {.a'e} and {ui} respectively (the nai is missing).
    81 KB (12,538 words) - 11:06, 26 January 2015
  • <code>pei</code> can be given with cmavo from the UI Family of "attitudinals". ui - "I'm happy"
    39 KB (5,361 words) - 19:49, 18 October 2020
  • == UI == * [[UI scope - Take 2]]
    2 KB (318 words) - 08:39, 15 June 2015
  • ...at lexer_A would flag utterance ordinals only, and the regular indicators (UI, CAI, Y) no longer need lexer flagging. Another side effect is that FUhO, D The attitudinals and discursives are both in the UI lexeme. Does this mean that the attitudinals can be compounded with the dis
    441 KB (72,114 words) - 00:44, 18 August 2020

View (previous 20 | next 20) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)