using Punctuation Marks as a Visual Aid: Difference between revisions
mNo edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{CODE(wrap="1]][[jbocre: 19:30]] <rlpowell> The whole "audio-visual isomorphism doesn't include things like paragraph breaks" shifted me *a lot* on the topic of punctuation. | |||
[[jbocre: 19:30]] <lojsmanix> .lojsmanix. | |||
[[jbocre: 19:30]] <treed> Uh, it's a cmevla, so you can shorten it however you want. | |||
[[jbocre: 19:30]] <donri> valsi: affix:sma | |||
[[jbocre: 19:30]] <valsi> smaji = x1 (source) is quiet/silent/[[jbocre: still|still]] at observation point x2 by standard x3. | |||
[[jbocre: 19:30]] <treed> I actually kinda parse that as having something to do with nixli | |||
[[jbocre: 19:30]] <lojsmanix> mi'e la .ctujveclic. | |||
[[jbocre: 19:31]] <treed> lojbanic small girl? | |||
[[jbocre: 19:31]] <treed> valsi: affix:nix | |||
[[jbocre: 19:31]] <valsi> nixli = x1 is a girl [[jbocre: young female person|young female person]] of age x2 immature by standard x3. | |||
[[jbocre: 19:31]] <treed> yeah | |||
[[jbocre: 19:31]] <Twey> rlpowell: Shifted you how? | |||
[[jbocre: 19:31]] <rlpowell> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mycoplasma_laboratorium -- nifty | |||
[[jbocre: 19:31]] <donri> treed: silent* | |||
[[jbocre: 19:32]] <treed> er, yeah | |||
[[jbocre: 19:32]] <Twey> rlpowell: I'd see that as shifting you *towards* (things like) hyphens, if anything — it's another example of something that is nice to have for visual clarity without affecting the meaning of the sentence. | |||
[[jbocre: 19:32]] <rlpowell> Twey: To being bothered less by it. | |||
[[jbocre: 19:32]] <Twey> Ah, right. | |||
[[jbocre: 19:32]] <rlpowell> Yes, that's what I'm saying. | |||
[[jbocre: 19:32]] <Twey> *nod* | |||
[[jbocre: 19:32]] * treed is still bothered by it. | |||
[[jbocre: 19:32]] <rlpowell> I had a kneejerk negative reaction that doesn't match my current intellectual beliefs. | |||
[[jbocre: 19:32]] <rlpowell> treed: So am I, I just no longer feel that I can justify my bothered-ness. | |||
[[jbocre: 19:33]] <Twey> Yeah: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QHIocNOHd7A | |||
[[jbocre: 19:33]] <Twey> rlpowell: *nod* | |||
[[jbocre: 19:34]] <Twey> treed: Do things like paragraph breaks or newlines also bother you? | |||
[[jbocre: 19:34]] <rlpowell> Having a completely bizarre semi-formal ... not calligraphic. What do you call a language's system of punctuation and stuff? | |||
[[jbocre: 19:34]] <rlpowell> There's a term clsn uses to describe how Samaritan X is different from Hebrew X, even though it's nearly the same writing system. | |||
[[jbocre: 19:34]] <Twey> Typography? | |||
[[jbocre: 19:34]] <rlpowell> Like they have a tradition of lining up the first letters of things to spell interesting stuff the other way. | |||
[[jbocre: 19:35]] <rlpowell> No, not typography; that's the letters themselves. The ways in which they are arranged and used visually. | |||
[[jbocre: 19:35]] <donri> Twey: Arrows! u'i←pei | |||
[[jbocre: 19:35]] <Twey> donri: Cute :þ | |||
[[jbocre: 19:35]] <donri> Then you can cluster LENU properly | |||
[[jbocre: 19:36]] <donri> lo→nu gau←mi mupli | |||
[[jbocre: 19:36]] <donri> yyyyy | |||
[[jbocre: 19:36]] <donri> zo'o←→cu'i | |||
[[jbocre: 19:36]] <Twey> rlpowell: Typography covers the arrangement of letters and things like punctuation, too | |||
[[jbocre: 19:36]] <treed> Twey: No, but that's just positioning. | |||
[[jbocre: 19:37]] <Twey> Ah, true. | |||
[[jbocre: 19:37]] <rlpowell> Anyways, having a bizarre and semi-formal X with lots of weird characters in it would fit with the nerdiness of Lojban well enough. Like programming languages with a kernel language and then a bunch of syntactic shortcuts. | |||
[[jbocre: 19:37]] <Twey> donri: I'm not sure I get your arrows. | |||
[[jbocre: 19:37]] <donri> I don't mind added punctuation as long as its an aid and not a requirement for disambiguation | |||
[[jbocre: 19:37]] <Twey> rlpowell: Heh, yes. | |||
[[jbocre: 19:37]] <donri> But, I just don't think the hyphen is pretty :D | |||
[[jbocre: 19:38]] <Twey> rlpowell: Especially so long as it can be easily filtered out and the resulting pure Lojban read instead. | |||
[[jbocre: 19:38]] == tomoj [[jbocre: ~user@cpe-70-112-93-29.austin.res.rr.com]] has quit [[jbocre: Remote host closed the connection|Remote host closed the connection]] | |||
[[jbocre: 19:38]] <rlpowell> Twey: Quite. | |||
[[jbocre: 19:38]] <donri> u'i↑¯¯¯ punctuation for tone! | |||
[[jbocre: 19:39]] <Twey> rlpowell: I'm personally of the opinion that any non-Lojban characters should be ignored by parsers (except in non-Lojban quotes, obviously). | |||
[[jbocre: 19:39]] <rlpowell> I still like to keep my tone flat when speaking Lojban. | |||
[[jbocre: 19:39]] <Twey> gerna .o'a-dai | |||
[[jbocre: 19:39]] <gerna> not grammatical: ._o'a-dai_ ⚠ | |||
[[jbocre: 19:39]] <Twey> ^ broken pe'i-ru'e | |||
[[jbocre: 19:39]] <rlpowell> It helps me shift state towards using UI and stuff.{CODE} |
Revision as of 17:18, 4 November 2013
{CODE(wrap="1]]jbocre: 19:30 <rlpowell> The whole "audio-visual isomorphism doesn't include things like paragraph breaks" shifted me *a lot* on the topic of punctuation.
jbocre: 19:30 <lojsmanix> .lojsmanix.
jbocre: 19:30 <treed> Uh, it's a cmevla, so you can shorten it however you want.
jbocre: 19:30 <donri> valsi: affix:sma
jbocre: 19:30 <valsi> smaji = x1 (source) is quiet/silent/still at observation point x2 by standard x3.
jbocre: 19:30 <treed> I actually kinda parse that as having something to do with nixli
jbocre: 19:30 <lojsmanix> mi'e la .ctujveclic.
jbocre: 19:31 <treed> lojbanic small girl?
jbocre: 19:31 <treed> valsi: affix:nix
jbocre: 19:31 <valsi> nixli = x1 is a girl young female person of age x2 immature by standard x3.
jbocre: 19:31 <treed> yeah
jbocre: 19:31 <Twey> rlpowell: Shifted you how?
jbocre: 19:31 <rlpowell> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mycoplasma_laboratorium -- nifty
jbocre: 19:31 <donri> treed: silent*
jbocre: 19:32 <treed> er, yeah
jbocre: 19:32 <Twey> rlpowell: I'd see that as shifting you *towards* (things like) hyphens, if anything — it's another example of something that is nice to have for visual clarity without affecting the meaning of the sentence.
jbocre: 19:32 <rlpowell> Twey: To being bothered less by it.
jbocre: 19:32 <Twey> Ah, right.
jbocre: 19:32 <rlpowell> Yes, that's what I'm saying.
jbocre: 19:32 <Twey> *nod*
jbocre: 19:32 * treed is still bothered by it.
jbocre: 19:32 <rlpowell> I had a kneejerk negative reaction that doesn't match my current intellectual beliefs.
jbocre: 19:32 <rlpowell> treed: So am I, I just no longer feel that I can justify my bothered-ness.
jbocre: 19:33 <Twey> Yeah: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QHIocNOHd7A
jbocre: 19:33 <Twey> rlpowell: *nod*
jbocre: 19:34 <Twey> treed: Do things like paragraph breaks or newlines also bother you?
jbocre: 19:34 <rlpowell> Having a completely bizarre semi-formal ... not calligraphic. What do you call a language's system of punctuation and stuff?
jbocre: 19:34 <rlpowell> There's a term clsn uses to describe how Samaritan X is different from Hebrew X, even though it's nearly the same writing system.
jbocre: 19:34 <Twey> Typography?
jbocre: 19:34 <rlpowell> Like they have a tradition of lining up the first letters of things to spell interesting stuff the other way.
jbocre: 19:35 <rlpowell> No, not typography; that's the letters themselves. The ways in which they are arranged and used visually.
jbocre: 19:35 <donri> Twey: Arrows! u'i←pei
jbocre: 19:35 <Twey> donri: Cute :þ
jbocre: 19:35 <donri> Then you can cluster LENU properly
jbocre: 19:36 <donri> lo→nu gau←mi mupli
jbocre: 19:36 <donri> yyyyy
jbocre: 19:36 <donri> zo'o←→cu'i
jbocre: 19:36 <Twey> rlpowell: Typography covers the arrangement of letters and things like punctuation, too
jbocre: 19:36 <treed> Twey: No, but that's just positioning.
jbocre: 19:37 <Twey> Ah, true.
jbocre: 19:37 <rlpowell> Anyways, having a bizarre and semi-formal X with lots of weird characters in it would fit with the nerdiness of Lojban well enough. Like programming languages with a kernel language and then a bunch of syntactic shortcuts.
jbocre: 19:37 <Twey> donri: I'm not sure I get your arrows.
jbocre: 19:37 <donri> I don't mind added punctuation as long as its an aid and not a requirement for disambiguation
jbocre: 19:37 <Twey> rlpowell: Heh, yes.
jbocre: 19:37 <donri> But, I just don't think the hyphen is pretty :D
jbocre: 19:38 <Twey> rlpowell: Especially so long as it can be easily filtered out and the resulting pure Lojban read instead.
jbocre: 19:38 == tomoj jbocre: ~user@cpe-70-112-93-29.austin.res.rr.com has quit Remote host closed the connection
jbocre: 19:38 <rlpowell> Twey: Quite.
jbocre: 19:38 <donri> u'i↑¯¯¯ punctuation for tone!
jbocre: 19:39 <Twey> rlpowell: I'm personally of the opinion that any non-Lojban characters should be ignored by parsers (except in non-Lojban quotes, obviously).
jbocre: 19:39 <rlpowell> I still like to keep my tone flat when speaking Lojban.
jbocre: 19:39 <Twey> gerna .o'a-dai
jbocre: 19:39 <gerna> not grammatical: ._o'a-dai_ ⚠
jbocre: 19:39 <Twey> ^ broken pe'i-ru'e
jbocre: 19:39 <rlpowell> It helps me shift state towards using UI and stuff.{CODE}