sAE

Notes in square brackets of whether each feature is possible in Lojban.

Haspelmath (2001) lists further features characteristic of European languages (but also found elsewhere):

1. verb-initial order in yes/no questions
   • optionally possible in Lojban
2. comparative inflection of adjectives (e.g. English bigger)
   • optionally possible in Lojban
3. conjunction A, B and C
   • no, needs extra ke ... ke'e brackets for nesting, the default is "A and B and C"
4. syncretism of comitative and instrumental cases (e.g. English with my friends vs. with a knife)
   • terrible polysemy, but comitative is vague enough to be used instead of instrumental, so yes, possible
5. suppletivism in second vs. two
   • of course not, it's stupid and has mostly historical explanations
6. no distinction between alienable (e.g. legal property) and inalienable (e.g. body part) possession
   • possible with pe
7. no distinction between inclusive and exclusive first-person plural pronouns ("we and you" vs. "we and not you")
   • not possible yet, always distinguishable, probably the definition of SAE "we" should be "I and other people, optionally including the listener". Experimental mi'ai is a possible solution.
8. no productive usage of reduplication
   • yes, not used
9. topic and focus expressed by intonation and word order
   • possilbe with intonation; possible by word order, which is probably an universal
10. word order subject–verb–object
    • yes, by default
11. only one gerund, preference for finite subordinate clauses
    • well, one gerund is definitely possible
12. specific "neither-nor" construction
    • not very specific, a part of a neat conjunctive system
13. phrasal adverbs (e.g. English already, still, not yet)
    • can be seen as advebrs
14. tendency towards replacement of past tense by the perfect
    • pragmatically possible as a tendency, not as a rule