Talk:BPFK Section: Text Structure cmavo as of 11 Feb 2005
Posted by Anonymous on Tue 05 of June, 2007 19:07 GMT This comment is s bit misleading, as it suggests that there is something special about MAI that breaks LALR(1). But even if MAI were to be removed from the language, or made prefix, the problem with numbers would remain just the same, because you can't tell "number MOI", "number ROI" and "number /BOI/" appart from each other without indefinite lookahead, the same goes for "lerfu-string MOI" vs. "lerfu-string /BOI/", and I think compound tags break LALR(1) too.
"A term is either a sumti or a sumti preceded by a tense or modal tag."
Also: "na ku", "tag ku" and the most weird "fa ku" are terms.
mu'o mi'e xorxes
Score: 0.00 Vote: 1 2 3 4 5 top of page Reply
Edit Delete Report this post
BPFK Section: Text Structure cmavo as of 11 Feb 2005
Posted by PierreAbbat on Tue 05 of June, 2007 22:59 GMT posts: 324 On Tuesday 05 June 2007 15:04, Jorge Llambías wrote: > Also: "na ku", "tag ku" and the most weird "fa ku" are terms.
A term can come after {pe}, yielding some weird sentences: {le gerku pe fa ku pu viska le mlatu pe na ku}. Should we attempt to assign a meaning to those, or should we explicitly define them as meaningless?
Pierre
Score: 0.00 Vote: 1 2 3 4 5 top of page Reply
Edit Delete Report this post
BPFK Section: Text Structure cmavo as of 11 Feb 2005
Posted by JohnCowan on Wed 06 of June, 2007 06:07 GMT posts: 149 Pierre Abbat scripsit: > On Tuesday 05 June 2007 15:04, Jorge Llambías wrote: > > Also: "na ku", "tag ku" and the most weird "fa ku" are terms. > > A term can come after {pe}, yielding some weird sentences: {le gerku pe fa ku > pu viska le mlatu pe na ku}. Should we attempt to assign a meaning to those, > or should we explicitly define them as meaningless?
I interpret "pe fa ku" to mean "pe the x1 of this bridi", but I can't interpret "pe naku", I admit.
-- John Cowan http://www.ccil.org/~cowan You tollerday donsk? N. You tolkatiff scowegian? Nn. You spigotty anglease? Nnn. You phonio saxo? Nnnn. Clear all so! `Tis a Jute.... (Finnegans Wake 16.5)
Score: 0.00 Vote: 1 2 3 4 5 top of page Reply
Edit Delete Report this post
BPFK Section: Text Structure cmavo as of 11 Feb 2005
Posted by Anonymous on Wed 06 of June, 2007 12:36 GMT On 6/6/07, John Cowan wrote: > Pierre Abbat scripsit: > > > > A term can come after {pe}, yielding some weird sentences: {le gerku pe fa ku > > pu viska le mlatu pe na ku}. Should we attempt to assign a meaning to those, > > or should we explicitly define them as meaningless? > > I interpret "pe fa ku" to mean "pe the x1 of this bridi", but I can't > interpret "pe naku", I admit.
How about this:
le re mlatu cu fa'u gi xekri gi nai xekri .i le gerku pu viska le mlatu pe na ku
mu'o mi'e xorxes