Search results

Jump to navigation Jump to search
  • Are you sure? I would disagree with you (and I know other jbocre > Are you sure? I would disagree with you (and I know other jbocre
    284 KB (49,283 words) - 18:36, 30 April 2015
  • {{jbocre/en}} ...oposal is also that the Lojban community adopt additional keywords/glosses/terminology or similar for "mi'i". "mi'i" should be given the keyword/gloss "centered
    79 KB (13,316 words) - 07:12, 5 October 2022
  • ...d jbofi'e doesn't handle tagged termsets), so I was wondering if some kind jbocre can help us out here? ...ng beaten by me Lojban web-related terminology BPFK Section: Digressives...
    19 KB (1,669 words) - 08:42, 26 January 2015
  • ...idn't the LLG already done that? There should be some reference to the LLG terminology which would have higher scope than any of LLG's child organizations ...They are committees of the LLG, not child organizations. The difference in terminology matters.
    470 KB (80,057 words) - 21:46, 22 November 2022
  • {{jbocre/en}}Originally placed at http://www.lojban.org/files/papers/nsn_semantics_p terminology: see Cook 1989:15) Thus vreji "X is a record of event Y in
    22 KB (3,589 words) - 09:09, 30 June 2014
  • {{jbocre/en}} Use the terminology of macrodigits and microdigits (explained elsewhere).
    41 KB (7,222 words) - 06:53, 9 September 2016
  • {{jbocre/en}} ...ing to BY* referencing a defined number (in the CLL, called a "variable" - terminology of dubious merit, but that is of no matter here), one would think that the
    5 KB (913 words) - 21:41, 10 August 2016
  • ...Board, so they were already partly official; maybe in your version another terminology should be used, possibly "standards candidate" or some such, as they wouldn coi jbocre
    521 KB (87,367 words) - 21:48, 22 November 2022