zipcpi: Yet another gadri article

Where there are two gadri separated by a slash, the first one refers to the objects treated as individuals, and the second one refers to objects treated as a mass.

Chart

Spectrum of the Gadri 
and the type of Referring Descriptions they create

         Frank
            \       that cat              the/a cat                                     Mr Cat    Plato's Cat Statue     
             \          |                     |                                            |            /
[definite]--la/lai--le'i/lei'i--le'e/le'ei--le/lei--<referents] lo/loi [no referents>--lo'e/lo'ei--lo'i/loi'i--[indefinite]     
             /          |           |         \                   |                        |           |
            /           |           |          \             null determiner           Platitudes      |
           /       Demonstrative Anaphoric      \        <--context resolves-->                     Modeling
         Names                                Deictic

la / lai

Name determiner. la broda = the one(s) named "Broda". The definition of broda is irrelevant; what matters is what the speakers have agreed to name or address as broda.

le'i / lei'i

Demonstrative determiner. le'i broda = "this/that broda(s)". Indicates that the speaker is signaling a particular broda(s) to the listener. Roughly equivalent to ti/ta/tu noi broda, but does not imply spatial distance or presence, and is often grammatically more convenient as it doesn't start a new sub-bridi.

ko tcidu le'i cukta = "Read this/that book."

If spatial distance is important, use vi/va/vu, e.g. le'i vu cmana = "that mountain way over there"

le'e / le'ei

Anaphoric determiner. le'e broda = the aforementioned broda(s). Essentially identical to le bi'unai broda. Used to refer to something mentioned earlier in the text/conversation.

le / lei

Deictic determiner. le broda = the broda(s) that are identifiable or knowable.

For example, if a wife returns home after watching a play, she might have this conversation with her husband:
W: coi = "Hello."
H: coi .i xu do nelci le draci = "Hi. Did you like the play? (that you just watched)"
W: na'e uinai = "No. *sadness*"

lo / loi

Null/descriptive determiner. lo broda = something(s) that brodas. This is the simplest gadri of all, and can mean le or lo'e depending on context. lo is pretty much "never wrong", but le and lo'e can be used when definiteness is important.

mi djica lo nu do penmi lo prenu = "I want you to meet someone." Compare with:

mi djica lo nu do penmi le prenu = "I want you to meet the person (a/some particular person[s])."
mi djica lo nu do penmi le'e prenu = "I want you to meet that person (that we were talking about).
mi djica lo nu do penmi lo'e prenu = I want you to meet people (in general; I don't care who you meet)."

lo'e / lo'ei

Generalizing determiner. lo'e broda = brodas in general, without referring to any broda in particular.

Continuing the previous conversation of the wife who watched the play:
H: ue .i xunai do nelci lo'e draci = "Eh? Don't you like plays? (plays in general)"
W: je'a = "Yes (I do like plays; xunai only makes the question rhetorically negative, and does not change the expected answer)"
H: je'e = "OK. (Understood / Roger)"

Note that this differs from xu do nelci ro draci "Do you like all plays?", which is most probably false. Even the biggest fan of plays would probably hate some plays; in fact, they may hate it all the more because of their appreciation of plays in general!

lo'i / loi'i

Essentialistic determiner. lo'i broda = the essentialistic/Platonic model of broda. The truth value of the sentence would depend on the definition of broda; what constitutes "broda-ness", regardless of the actual status of things that broda.

xu lo'i remna cu danlu = "Are humans animals? / Is animality a part of humanity?" (true, as Lojban danlu does not imply non-personhood like English "animal" might.)

xu ro remna cu se tuple lo remei = "Do all humans have two legs?" (False; some have certainly lost their legs, or were not born with them.)
xu lo'i remna cu se tuple lo remei = "Is humanity characterized by having two legs?" (Probably true however; since for most people, their defining model of a "human" will have two legs.)

xu ro remna cu mroka'e = "Are all humans mortal?" (True; compare with the next sentence)
xu lo'i remna cu mroka'e = "Is mortality a part of humanity?" (a very interesting question indeed; you might get very different answers depending if you asked a transhumanist, a priest, or a nihilist!)

Note that this makes xu do nelci lo'i draci "Is (you liking it) a part of (being-a-play-ness)?" a pretty ridiculous question; plays aren't characterized by whether the wife likes it or not!

mo'oi / moi'oi

Interrogative determiner. mo'oi broda = which broda? Roughly equivalent to ma noi, but doesn't start a new sub-bridi.

mo'oi prenu cu bevri le pipno = "Which person(s) carried the piano?"
mo'oi mu prenu cu bevri le pipno = "Which five people carried the piano?"

Non-gadri: voi

Titular relative clause. Provides a "subtitle" to a name in the form of a sub-bridi.

la .aleksandyr. voi banli = "Alexander the Great"
la .uubis. voi daspo su'o terdi = "Woobie, the Destroyer of Worlds"

(It's been noted that under the cmevla-brivla merge proposal, noi would still be part of the name if the name is not closed by ku * but... yeah I think voi signals the intent much better, with or without that merge.)

* (and without the merge, only brivlacme can have suffixed titles with noi; cmevlacme must use la noi banli vau .aleksandyr. . Yuck.)

Expected impact

No change: la/lai, lo/loi (xorlo version)
No real change; just a cleaned-up/tightened definition: le/lei, voi
Slight shift in definition?: lo'e
Significant shift in definition: lo'i
Completely reassigned: le'i, le'e
New cmavo: lei'i, le'ei, lo'ei, loi'i, mo'oi, moi'oi