writing conventions: Difference between revisions

From Lojban
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 7: Line 7:
*These are the ones that I usually use.
*These are the ones that I usually use.
<tab class="wikitable">
<tab class="wikitable">
<nowiki>*{…}</nowiki> used for incorrect Lojban text.
<nowiki>*{…}</nowiki> used for incorrect Lojban text.
<nowiki>?{…}</nowiki> used for questionable text (either a subject of debate, or to quote without asserting correctness, for instance, asking a student what, if anything, the text would mean).
<nowiki>?{…}</nowiki> used for questionable text (either a subject of debate, or to quote without asserting correctness, for instance, asking a student what, if anything, the text would mean).
<nowiki>!{…}</nowiki> used for text that parses, but has a surprising or wrong meaning (one not intended).
<nowiki>!{…}</nowiki> used for text that parses, but has a surprising or wrong meaning (one not intended).
<nowiki>[…]</nowiki> used to indicate words (usually terminators or {cu}) that can be included or omitted without changing the parse.
<nowiki>[…]</nowiki> used to indicate words (usually terminators or {cu}) that can be included or omitted without changing the parse.
-…- used for quoting rafsi, like -mib-, the rafsi for {mi}
-…- used for quoting rafsi, like -mib-, the rafsi for {mi}
"…" used for quoting English. The , ?, and ! modifiers can be applied if needed.
"…" used for quoting English. The , ?, and ! modifiers can be applied if needed.
⟨…⟩ used for quoting sequences of characters. "No, you couldn't use ⟨la⟩ in a cmevla pre-Dot Side."
⟨…⟩ used for quoting sequences of characters. "No, you couldn't use ⟨la⟩ in a cmevla pre-Dot Side."
used to qualify a statement, to mean "This isn't actually true, but it's close enough for the current purposes." "cmevla can only† be used as names, but not all names are cmevla."
used to qualify a statement, to mean "This isn't actually true, but it's close enough for the current purposes." "cmevla can only† be used as names, but not all names are cmevla."
used for "I don't know whether this is actually precisely true or not, but it's close enough for now." "You use ZOI, then any‡ Lojban word as a delimiter…" (Really? What about {bu}? What about {si}? What about {fa'o}?)
used for "I don't know whether this is actually precisely true or not, but it's close enough for now." "You use ZOI, then any‡ Lojban word as a delimiter…" (Really? What about {bu}? What about {si}? What about {fa'o}?)
</tab>
</tab>



Revision as of 15:04, 30 May 2014

Some conventions used when talking about Lojban in English, for instance on IRC or in mailing lists. <tab class="wikitable"> {…} used to quote Lojban text. Alternatively Lojban text is written in bold. </tab>

la xalbo:

  • These are the ones that I usually use.

<tab class="wikitable"> *{…} used for incorrect Lojban text. ?{…} used for questionable text (either a subject of debate, or to quote without asserting correctness, for instance, asking a student what, if anything, the text would mean). !{…} used for text that parses, but has a surprising or wrong meaning (one not intended). […] used to indicate words (usually terminators or {cu}) that can be included or omitted without changing the parse. -…- used for quoting rafsi, like -mib-, the rafsi for {mi} "…" used for quoting English. The , ?, and ! modifiers can be applied if needed. ⟨…⟩ used for quoting sequences of characters. "No, you couldn't use ⟨la⟩ in a cmevla pre-Dot Side." † used to qualify a statement, to mean "This isn't actually true, but it's close enough for the current purposes." "cmevla can only† be used as names, but not all names are cmevla." ‡ used for "I don't know whether this is actually precisely true or not, but it's close enough for now." "You use ZOI, then any‡ Lojban word as a delimiter…" (Really? What about {bu}? What about {si}? What about {fa'o}?) </tab>

For other loglangs: <tab class="wikitable"> <…> used to quote Loglan text. ~…~ used to quote gua\spi text. \…\ used to quote toki pona text. </tab>