the Definition of 'gi': Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
m (Gleki moved page jbocre: The Definition of 'gi' to The Definition of 'gi' without leaving a redirect: Text replace - "jbocre: T" to "T") |
Revision as of 14:36, 23 March 2014
 | This page contains discussions of experimental/scientific/philosophical/logical aspects of Lojban that are non-official and not for everyday usage. You've been warned. |
- vensa:
- why is gi defined as "logical connective: ALL BUT TANRU-INTERNAL forethought connective medial marker.", if it is in fact used also within a forethought TANRU construct?
- kribacr:
- It's not, as far as I know.
- vensa:
- It's NOT what?
- kribacr:
- I believe *{broda GI brode GA brodi} is a parsefail.
- vensa:
- huh? how does that answer the question?
- I'm talking about {da GUhA broda gi brode}
- (0[da CU {<gu'a broda gi brode> <de VAU>}])0
- seems ok
- so why the ill-worded def?
- xalbo:
- right, GI works with GUhA too. The definition is in error.
- vensa:
- I suspect a copy-paste error
- .ui
- xalbo: can you fix it (officialy)?
- kribacr:
- Ah... yeah.
- kribacr:
- Didn't click, you're right.
- I forgot about that.
- vensa:
- np
- xalbo:
- byfy is working through defining all the cmavo. When we get to {gi}, I'm sure it won't look like that.