the Definition of 'gi': Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{jbocre/en}} | |||
*[[User:vensa|vensa]]: | |||
*:why is '''gi''' defined as "logical connective: ALL BUT TANRU-INTERNAL forethought connective medial marker.", if it is in fact used also within a forethought TANRU construct? | |||
*[[User:kribacr|kribacr]]: | |||
*:It's not, as far as I know. | |||
*[[User:vensa|vensa]]: | |||
*:It's NOT what? | |||
*[[User:kribacr|kribacr]]: | |||
*:I believe *{broda GI brode GA brodi} is a parsefail. | |||
*[[User:vensa|vensa]]: | |||
*:huh? how does that answer the question? | |||
*:I'm talking about {da GUhA broda gi brode} | |||
*:(0[da CU {<gu'a broda gi brode> <de VAU>}])0 | |||
*:seems ok | |||
*:so why the ill-worded def? | |||
*[[User:xalbo|xalbo]]: | |||
*:right, GI works with GUhA too. The definition is in error. | |||
*[[User:vensa|vensa]]: | |||
*:I suspect a copy-paste error | |||
*:.ui | |||
*:xalbo: can you fix it (officialy)? | |||
*[[User:kribacr|kribacr]]: | |||
*:Ah... yeah. | |||
*[[User:kribacr|kribacr]]: | |||
*:Didn't click, you're right. | |||
*:I forgot about that. | |||
*[[User:vensa|vensa]]: | |||
*:np | |||
*[[User:xalbo|xalbo]]: | |||
*:byfy is working through defining all the cmavo. When we get to {gi}, I'm sure it won't look like that. |
Revision as of 07:06, 26 December 2013
This page contains discussions of experimental/scientific/philosophical/logical aspects of Lojban that are non-official and not for everyday usage. You've been warned. |
- vensa:
- why is gi defined as "logical connective: ALL BUT TANRU-INTERNAL forethought connective medial marker.", if it is in fact used also within a forethought TANRU construct?
- kribacr:
- It's not, as far as I know.
- vensa:
- It's NOT what?
- kribacr:
- I believe *{broda GI brode GA brodi} is a parsefail.
- vensa:
- huh? how does that answer the question?
- I'm talking about {da GUhA broda gi brode}
- (0[da CU {<gu'a broda gi brode> <de VAU>}])0
- seems ok
- so why the ill-worded def?
- xalbo:
- right, GI works with GUhA too. The definition is in error.
- vensa:
- I suspect a copy-paste error
- .ui
- xalbo: can you fix it (officialy)?
- kribacr:
- Ah... yeah.
- kribacr:
- Didn't click, you're right.
- I forgot about that.
- vensa:
- np
- xalbo:
- byfy is working through defining all the cmavo. When we get to {gi}, I'm sure it won't look like that.