the Definition of 'gi': Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (Gleki moved page jbocre: The Definition of 'gi' to The Definition of 'gi' without leaving a redirect: Text replace - "jbocre: T" to "T") |
No edit summary |
||
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{jbocre/en}} | {{jbocre/en}} | ||
{{irci|vensa|why is '''gi''' defined as "logical connective: ALL BUT TANRU-INTERNAL forethought connective medial marker.", if it is in fact used also within a forethought TANRU construct?}} | |||
{{irci|kribacr|It's not, as far as I know.}} | |||
{{irci|vensa|It's NOT what?}} | |||
{{irci|kribacr|I believe *'''broda GI brode GA brodi''' is a parsefail.}} | |||
{{irci|vensa|huh? how does that answer the question?<br/>I'm talking about '''da GUhA broda gi brode'''<br/><nowiki>(0[da CU {<gu'a broda gi brode> <de VAU>}])0</nowiki><br/>seems ok so why the ill-worded def?}} | |||
{{irci|xalbo|right, GI works with GUhA too. The definition is in error.}} | |||
{{irci|vensa|I suspect a copy-paste error<br/>xalbo: can you fix it (officialy)?}} | |||
Latest revision as of 15:21, 23 December 2014
This page contains discussions of experimental/scientific/philosophical/logical aspects of Lojban that are non-official and not for everyday usage. You've been warned. |
vensa | why is gi defined as "logical connective: ALL BUT TANRU-INTERNAL forethought connective medial marker.", if it is in fact used also within a forethought TANRU construct? |
kribacr | It's not, as far as I know. |
vensa | It's NOT what? |
kribacr | I believe *broda GI brode GA brodi is a parsefail. |
vensa | huh? how does that answer the question? I'm talking about da GUhA broda gi brode (0[da CU {<gu'a broda gi brode> <de VAU>}])0 seems ok so why the ill-worded def? |
xalbo | right, GI works with GUhA too. The definition is in error. |
vensa | I suspect a copy-paste error xalbo: can you fix it (officialy)? |