the Definition of 'gi': Difference between revisions

From Lojban
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (Conversion script moved page The Definition of 'gi' to the Definition of 'gi': Converting page titles to lowercase)
No edit summary
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{jbocre/en}}
{{jbocre/en}}
*[[User:vensa|vensa]]:
{{irci|vensa|why is '''gi''' defined as "logical connective: ALL BUT TANRU-INTERNAL forethought connective medial marker.", if it is in fact used also within a forethought TANRU construct?}}
*:why is '''gi''' defined as "logical connective: ALL BUT TANRU-INTERNAL forethought connective medial marker.", if it is in fact used also within a forethought TANRU construct?
{{irci|kribacr|It's not, as far as I know.}}
 
{{irci|vensa|It's NOT what?}}
*[[User:kribacr|kribacr]]:
{{irci|kribacr|I believe *'''broda GI brode GA brodi''' is a parsefail.}}
*:It's not, as far as I know.
{{irci|vensa|huh? how does that answer the question?<br/>I'm talking about '''da GUhA broda gi brode'''<br/><nowiki>(0[da CU {<gu'a broda gi brode> <de VAU>}])0</nowiki><br/>seems ok so why the ill-worded def?}}
 
{{irci|xalbo|right, GI works with GUhA too. The definition is in error.}}
*[[User:vensa|vensa]]:
{{irci|vensa|I suspect a copy-paste error<br/>xalbo: can you fix it (officialy)?}}
*:It's NOT what?
 
*[[User:kribacr|kribacr]]:
*:I believe *{broda GI brode GA brodi} is a parsefail.
 
*[[User:vensa|vensa]]:
*:huh? how does that answer the question?
*:I'm talking about {da GUhA broda gi brode}
*:(0[da CU {<gu'a broda gi brode> <de VAU>}])0
*:seems ok
*:so why the ill-worded def?
 
*[[User:xalbo|xalbo]]:
*:right, GI works with GUhA too. The definition is in error.
 
*[[User:vensa|vensa]]:
*:I suspect a copy-paste error
*:.ui
*:xalbo: can you fix it (officialy)?
 
*[[User:kribacr|kribacr]]:
*:Ah... yeah.
 
*[[User:kribacr|kribacr]]:
*:Didn't click, you're right.
*:I forgot about that.
 
*[[User:vensa|vensa]]:
*:np
 
*[[User:xalbo|xalbo]]:
*:byfy is working through defining all the cmavo. When we get to {gi}, I'm sure it won't look like that.

Latest revision as of 15:21, 23 December 2014

vensa why is gi defined as "logical connective: ALL BUT TANRU-INTERNAL forethought connective medial marker.", if it is in fact used also within a forethought TANRU construct?
kribacr It's not, as far as I know.
vensa It's NOT what?
kribacr I believe *broda GI brode GA brodi is a parsefail.
vensa huh? how does that answer the question?
I'm talking about da GUhA broda gi brode
(0[da CU {<gu'a broda gi brode> <de VAU>}])0
seems ok so why the ill-worded def?
xalbo right, GI works with GUhA too. The definition is in error.
vensa I suspect a copy-paste error
xalbo: can you fix it (officialy)?