quoting Vowels: Difference between revisions

From Lojban
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (Text replace - "{CODE}" to "</code>")
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
<code>[20:39] <tcatipax> ".i do ka'e jmina fi .ubu" = you have innate ability to add something to/with u? What am I getting wrong?


<code>[[jbocre: 20:39]] <tcatipax> ".i do ka'e jmina fi .ubu" = you have innate ability to add something to/with u? What am I getting wrong?
[20:41] <selpa`i> Is it wrong?


[[jbocre: 20:41]] <selpa`i> Is it wrong?
[20:41] <vensa> tcati: who said anything is wrong?


[[jbocre: 20:41]] <vensa> tcati: who said anything is wrong?
[20:41] <selpa`i> It parses


[[jbocre: 20:41]] <selpa`i> It parses
[20:41] <tcatipax> So, my interpretation is correct?


[[jbocre: 20:41]] <tcatipax> So, my interpretation is correct?
[20:43] <tcatipax> I don't know how that makes sense. It's on the front page of wikipedia.


[[jbocre: 20:43]] <tcatipax> I don't know how that makes sense. It's on the front page of wikipedia.
[20:44] <tcatipax> The lojban version.


[[jbocre: 20:44]] <tcatipax> The lojban version.
[20:44] <selpa`i> Could ubu be an abbreviation`?


[[jbocre: 20:44]] <selpa`i> Could ubu be an abbreviation`?
[20:45] <Twey> Yes


[[jbocre: 20:45]] <Twey> Yes
[20:45] <Twey> It has to be


[[jbocre: 20:45]] <Twey> It has to be
[20:45] <Twey> Otherwise it would be ‘me'o .ubu’, or something.


[[jbocre: 20:45]] <Twey> Otherwise it would be ‘me'o .ubu’, or something.
[20:45] <selpa`i> So maybe the section's name starts with u


[[jbocre: 20:45]] <selpa`i> So maybe the section's name starts with u
[20:45] <vensa> its short for .uikipedias


[[jbocre: 20:45]] <vensa> its short for .uikipedias
[20:45] <selpa`i> There you go.


[[jbocre: 20:45]] <selpa`i> There you go.
[20:45] <vensa> the sentence before says .uikipedias


[[jbocre: 20:45]] <vensa> the sentence before says .uikipedias
[20:46] <selpa`i> Context.


[[jbocre: 20:46]] <selpa`i> Context.
[20:46] <vensa> hehe


[[jbocre: 20:46]] <vensa> hehe
[20:46] <tcatipax> Ah.


[[jbocre: 20:46]] <tcatipax> Ah.
[20:46] <tcatipax> Thanks!


[[jbocre: 20:46]] <tcatipax> Thanks!
[20:46] <vensa> je'e


[[jbocre: 20:46]] <vensa> je'e
[20:47] <tcatipax> I mean, ki'e .ui


[[jbocre: 20:47]] <tcatipax> I mean, ki'e .ui
[20:47] <vensa> Twey: wouldn {lu ubu li'u} *cut* it too?
 
[[jbocre: 20:47]] <vensa> Twey: wouldn {lu ubu li'u} *cut* it too?


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


[[jbocre: 20:48]] <Twey> vensa: Not quite the same
[20:48] <Twey> vensa: Not quite the same


[[jbocre: 20:48]] <vensa> {li ubu} seems to cut it
[20:48] <vensa> {li ubu} seems to cut it


[[jbocre: 20:48]] <vensa> Twey: whats the diff?
[20:48] <vensa> Twey: whats the diff?


[[jbocre: 20:48]] <Twey> li .ubu is, I think, interpreting it as a mathematical variable with a number value
[20:48] <Twey> li .ubu is, I think, interpreting it as a mathematical variable with a number value


[[jbocre: 20:48]] <vensa> I read {me'o} is the wuote-equivalent for lerfu strings
[20:48] <vensa> I read {me'o} is the wuote-equivalent for lerfu strings


[[jbocre: 20:49]] <vensa> ok. but y not {lu ubu li'u}?
[20:49] <vensa> ok. but y not {lu ubu li'u}?


[[jbocre: 20:49]] <Twey> ‘lu ubu li'u’ would be quoting it as a whole utterance
[20:49] <Twey> ‘lu ubu li'u’ would be quoting it as a whole utterance


[[jbocre: 20:49]] <vensa> what does it mean "as a whole utterance"?
[20:49] <vensa> what does it mean "as a whole utterance"?


[[jbocre: 20:49]] <vensa> if it were {by} instead and I used {zo by}?
[20:49] <vensa> if it were {by} instead and I used {zo by}?


[[jbocre: 20:50]] <Twey> No, not ‘lu ubu li'u’, indeed
[20:50] <Twey> No, not ‘lu ubu li'u’, indeed


[[jbocre: 20:51]] <vensa> If the whole contents of your quote ends up to be one letter {ubu), how is that different from {zo}?
[20:51] <vensa> If the whole contents of your quote ends up to be one letter {ubu), how is that different from {zo}?


[[jbocre: 20:51]] <Twey> lu/li'u is for grammatical utterances
[20:51] <Twey> lu/li'u is for grammatical utterances


[[jbocre: 20:51]] <Twey> Whole grammatical utterances
[20:51] <Twey> Whole grammatical utterances


[[jbocre: 20:51]] <Twey> So it's taking that as a whole phrase that someone said, or something like that
[20:51] <Twey> So it's taking that as a whole phrase that someone said, or something like that


[[jbocre: 20:51]] <vensa> so,would {lo'u le'u} be ok with you?
[20:51] <vensa> so,would {lo'u le'u} be ok with you?


[[jbocre: 20:52]] <Twey> No, because that doesn't take grammar into account
[20:52] <Twey> No, because that doesn't take grammar into account


[[jbocre: 20:52]] == sshc [[jbocre: ~sshc@unaffiliated/sshc]] has quit [[jbocre: Read error: Connection reset by peer]]
[20:52] == sshc [[jbocre: ~sshc@unaffiliated/sshc]] has quit [[jbocre: Read error: Connection reset by peer]]


[[jbocre: 20:52]] <vensa> what do u mean?
[20:52] <vensa> what do u mean?


[[jbocre: 20:52]] <Twey> So ’ubu’ would be the two words ‘.u’ and ‘bu’
[20:52] <Twey> So ’ubu’ would be the two words ‘.u’ and ‘bu’


[[jbocre: 20:52]] <vensa> it wont parse the {bu}?
[20:52] <vensa> it wont parse the {bu}?


[[jbocre: 20:52]] <vensa> so you're saying {zo by} is not equivalent to {lu ubu li'u}? so basically theres no way to quote  a U?
[20:52] <vensa> so you're saying {zo by} is not equivalent to {lu ubu li'u}? so basically theres no way to quote  a U?


[[jbocre: 20:52]] <Twey> Not the single character U
[20:52] <Twey> Not the single character U


[[jbocre: 20:52]] <Twey> Sure there is — me'o
[20:52] <Twey> Sure there is — me'o


[[jbocre: 20:52]] <vensa> (except {me'o})
[20:52] <vensa> (except {me'o})


[[jbocre: 20:53]] <vensa> but {by} can be quoted in two ways
[20:53] <vensa> but {by} can be quoted in two ways


[[jbocre: 20:53]] <vensa> that doesnt seem fair  
[20:53] <vensa> that doesnt seem fair  


[[jbocre: 20:53]] <Twey> You can also quote with lu/li'u, but that means that it's dereferenced too (although possibly in a different context)
[20:53] <Twey> You can also quote with lu/li'u, but that means that it's dereferenced too (although possibly in a different context)


[[jbocre: 20:53]] <vensa> another reason to prefer my term for U: {u'y}
[20:53] <vensa> another reason to prefer my term for U: {u'y}


[[jbocre: 20:53]]  * Twey doesn't see what's wrong with me'o.
[20:53]  * Twey doesn't see what's wrong with me'o.


[[jbocre: 20:54]] <vensa> nothings *wrong* with it
[20:54] <vensa> nothings *wrong* with it


[[jbocre: 20:54]] <vensa> I just dont like the injustice that befalls vowels in lojban
[20:54] <vensa> I just dont like the injustice that befalls vowels in lojban


[[jbocre: 20:54]] <vensa> :)</code>
[20:54] <vensa> :)</code>

Revision as of 14:32, 21 March 2014

[20:39] <tcatipax> ".i do ka'e jmina fi .ubu" = you have innate ability to add something to/with u? What am I getting wrong?

[20:41] <selpa`i> Is it wrong?

[20:41] <vensa> tcati: who said anything is wrong?

[20:41] <selpa`i> It parses

[20:41] <tcatipax> So, my interpretation is correct?

[20:43] <tcatipax> I don't know how that makes sense. It's on the front page of wikipedia.

[20:44] <tcatipax> The lojban version.

[20:44] <selpa`i> Could ubu be an abbreviation`?

[20:45] <Twey> Yes

[20:45] <Twey> It has to be

[20:45] <Twey> Otherwise it would be ‘me'o .ubu’, or something.

[20:45] <selpa`i> So maybe the section's name starts with u

[20:45] <vensa> its short for .uikipedias

[20:45] <selpa`i> There you go.

[20:45] <vensa> the sentence before says .uikipedias

[20:46] <selpa`i> Context.

[20:46] <vensa> hehe

[20:46] <tcatipax> Ah.

[20:46] <tcatipax> Thanks!

[20:46] <vensa> je'e

[20:47] <tcatipax> I mean, ki'e .ui

[20:47] <vensa> Twey: wouldn {lu ubu li'u} *cut* it too?


[20:48] <Twey> vensa: Not quite the same

[20:48] <vensa> {li ubu} seems to cut it

[20:48] <vensa> Twey: whats the diff?

[20:48] <Twey> li .ubu is, I think, interpreting it as a mathematical variable with a number value

[20:48] <vensa> I read {me'o} is the wuote-equivalent for lerfu strings

[20:49] <vensa> ok. but y not {lu ubu li'u}?

[20:49] <Twey> ‘lu ubu li'u’ would be quoting it as a whole utterance

[20:49] <vensa> what does it mean "as a whole utterance"?

[20:49] <vensa> if it were {by} instead and I used {zo by}?

[20:50] <Twey> No, not ‘lu ubu li'u’, indeed

[20:51] <vensa> If the whole contents of your quote ends up to be one letter {ubu), how is that different from {zo}?

[20:51] <Twey> lu/li'u is for grammatical utterances

[20:51] <Twey> Whole grammatical utterances

[20:51] <Twey> So it's taking that as a whole phrase that someone said, or something like that

[20:51] <vensa> so,would {lo'u le'u} be ok with you?

[20:52] <Twey> No, because that doesn't take grammar into account

[20:52] == sshc jbocre: ~sshc@unaffiliated/sshc has quit jbocre: Read error: Connection reset by peer

[20:52] <vensa> what do u mean?

[20:52] <Twey> So ’ubu’ would be the two words ‘.u’ and ‘bu’

[20:52] <vensa> it wont parse the {bu}?

[20:52] <vensa> so you're saying {zo by} is not equivalent to {lu ubu li'u}? so basically theres no way to quote a U?

[20:52] <Twey> Not the single character U

[20:52] <Twey> Sure there is — me'o

[20:52] <vensa> (except {me'o})

[20:53] <vensa> but {by} can be quoted in two ways

[20:53] <vensa> that doesnt seem fair

[20:53] <Twey> You can also quote with lu/li'u, but that means that it's dereferenced too (although possibly in a different context)

[20:53] <vensa> another reason to prefer my term for U: {u'y}

[20:53] * Twey doesn't see what's wrong with me'o.

[20:54] <vensa> nothings *wrong* with it

[20:54] <vensa> I just dont like the injustice that befalls vowels in lojban

[20:54] <vensa> :)