natlang: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mNo edit summary |
m (Text replace - "jbocre: c" to "c") |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Synonym for [[jbocre: natural language|natural language]]: a human-usable language that is not a [[ | Synonym for [[jbocre: natural language|natural language]]: a human-usable language that is not a [[conlang|conlang]]. May be living or dead. There are about [http://www.ethnologue.org 000] living natlangs, many of which are nearly dead (no new native speakers). | ||
It's interesting that the number I hear keeps growing. I first heard 3000-5000, then 4000-6000, now you say it's 7000. | It's interesting that the number I hear keeps growing. I first heard 3000-5000, then 4000-6000, now you say it's 7000. | ||
''The SIL (which runs [http://www.ethnologue.org)] are notorious for calling lects languages which others would call dialects. 7000 is a sensible upper limit; the question of what counts as a language is ultimately political rather than linguistic.'' | ''The SIL (which runs [http://www.ethnologue.org)] are notorious for calling lects languages which others would call dialects. 7000 is a sensible upper limit; the question of what counts as a language is ultimately political rather than linguistic.'' |
Revision as of 12:15, 23 March 2014
Synonym for natural language: a human-usable language that is not a conlang. May be living or dead. There are about 000 living natlangs, many of which are nearly dead (no new native speakers).
It's interesting that the number I hear keeps growing. I first heard 3000-5000, then 4000-6000, now you say it's 7000.
The SIL (which runs [1] are notorious for calling lects languages which others would call dialects. 7000 is a sensible upper limit; the question of what counts as a language is ultimately political rather than linguistic.