audio-visual isomorphism: Difference between revisions

From Lojban
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (Text replace - "jbocre: ([a-z])" to "$1")
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
''Audio-visual isomorphism'' is the notion that spoken and written Lojban should be the same (have a one-to-one mapping).


*[[jezrax|jezrax]]:
*:"Isomorphism" is a strong word. It requires not only that no information be lost in converting from writing to speech or the other way, but also that no information be gained. The two must be structurally identical, and therefore functionally identical (from a mathematical point of view) as well.


The notion that spoken and written Lojban should be the same (have a one-to-one mapping.)
[[Breakdowns of audiovisual isomorphism]] are possible.
 
"Isomorphism" is a strong word. It requires not only that no information be lost in converting from writing to speech or the other way, but also that no information be gained. The two must be structurally identical, and therefore functionally identical (from a mathematical point of view) as well. ''mi'e [[jezrax|jezrax]]''
 
[[Breakdowns of audiovisual isomorphism|Breakdowns of audiovisual isomorphism]] are possible.

Revision as of 10:31, 2 September 2014

Audio-visual isomorphism is the notion that spoken and written Lojban should be the same (have a one-to-one mapping).

  • jezrax:
    "Isomorphism" is a strong word. It requires not only that no information be lost in converting from writing to speech or the other way, but also that no information be gained. The two must be structurally identical, and therefore functionally identical (from a mathematical point of view) as well.

Breakdowns of audiovisual isomorphism are possible.