Difference between revisions of "Why do PA are such?"

From Lojban
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "==Question== Why PA have the consonants they have: {{mu|no pa re ci vo mu xa ze bi so}} With vowels it's well known that they follow AEIOU pattern but what about consonants?...")
 
m (Gleki moved page Why PA are such? to Why do PA are such?)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
==Question==
 
==Question==
Why PA have the consonants they have:
+
Why do particles of the class PA have the consonants they have?
 
{{mu|no pa re ci vo mu xa ze bi so}}
 
{{mu|no pa re ci vo mu xa ze bi so}}
  

Latest revision as of 09:13, 12 May 2015

Question

Why do particles of the class PA have the consonants they have?

no pa re ci vo mu xa ze bi so

With vowels it's well known that they follow AEIOU pattern but what about consonants? Why these, not other consonants were chosen?

Answer

  • la lojbab:
    1. They had to be different from each other.
    2. They had to be strongly contrasting against other numerals with the same vowel (hence pa/xa ci/bi and not pa/ba ci/ji or pi/bi).
    3. They could not disrupt other paradigms (systems of cmavo) that had good claims to either history or practicality:
    • Once those constraints were set, there weren't all that many contrasting CV choices that also allowed the vowel pattern. Certainly not any that allowed a consonant pattern (as there is with hex digits where the consonants are contrasting and alphabetical). There is a visible trace of an attempt to make them alphabetical no/pa/re vo xa/ze but there were too few uncommitted CVs to make it work.