Why do PA are such?: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "==Question== Why PA have the consonants they have: {{mu|no pa re ci vo mu xa ze bi so}} With vowels it's well known that they follow AEIOU pattern but what about consonants?...") |
m (Gleki moved page Why PA are such? to Why do PA are such?) |
||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Question== | ==Question== | ||
Why PA have the consonants they have | Why do particles of the class PA have the consonants they have? | ||
{{mu|no pa re ci vo mu xa ze bi so}} | {{mu|no pa re ci vo mu xa ze bi so}} | ||
Latest revision as of 09:13, 12 May 2015
Question
Why do particles of the class PA have the consonants they have?
no pa re ci vo mu xa ze bi so |
With vowels it's well known that they follow AEIOU pattern but what about consonants? Why these, not other consonants were chosen?
Answer
- la lojbab:
- They had to be different from each other.
- They had to be strongly contrasting against other numerals with the same vowel (hence pa/xa ci/bi and not pa/ba ci/ji or pi/bi).
- They could not disrupt other paradigms (systems of cmavo) that had good claims to either history or practicality:
- Once those constraints were set, there weren't all that many contrasting CV choices that also allowed the vowel pattern. Certainly not any that allowed a consonant pattern (as there is with hex digits where the consonants are contrasting and alphabetical). There is a visible trace of an attempt to make them alphabetical no/pa/re vo xa/ze but there were too few uncommitted CVs to make it work.