Klingon: Difference between revisions

From Lojban
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (Text replace - "jbocre: Lojban and Klingon" to "Lojban and Klingon")
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
.i lo bangrtlingana no'u la klingon. je no'u la {{jvs|bantuluxe}} cu runti bangu .i se finti la'ogy.Marc Okrand.gy. noi bauskepre ku'o mu'i tu'a lo ranmi pe la .star.trek. .i lo datni cu zvati zoi gy.[http://www.kli.org www.kli.org].gy.


.i le bangrtlingana no'u la klingon. runti bangu .i se finti la'ogy. Marc Okrand gy. noi bauskepre ku'o mu'i tu'a le ranmi pe la star.trek. .i datni ti'u zoigy. [http://www.kli.org] gy.
ni'o [[User:Nick Nicholas|la .nitcion.]] .e la [[User:Mark Shoulson|.mark.]] cu ge lojbo gi se bantuluxe


ni'o la [[User:Nick Nicholas|nitcion]]. .e la [[User:Mark Shoulson|.mark.]] cu ge lojbo gi se bangrtlingana
.i ko ji'a tcidu zo'e ne la [[Lojban and Klingon|la .lojban. je lo bantuluxe]]
 
==Questions==
.i ko ji'a tcidu la [[Lojban and Klingon e la lojban. .e le bangrtlingana|Lojban and Klingon e la lojban. .e le bangrtlingana]]
*''Ahem. Do the Klingons mention Lojban on'' their ''Wiki?''
 
**Inasmuch as they don't have a Wiki, the question is meaningless. Lojban is certainly mentioned on their mailinglist, by persons other than me and Mark, and not with universal derision. And you may be delighted to see [http://www.kli.org/kli/langs/KLIlojban.html].
----
*[[User:Nick Nicholas|nitcion]]:
 
''Ahem. Do the Klingons mention Lojban on'' their ''Wiki?''
 
Inasmuch as they don't have a Wiki, the question is meaningless. Lojban is certainly mentioned on their mailinglist, by persons other than me and Mark, and not with universal derision. And you may be delighted to see [http://www.kli.org/kli/langs/KLIlojban.html] .
 
.i mi ji'a morji lesedu'u zo'e .e'a cusku loi lojbo steci pe bau le glico .e ro da pe bau la lojban. kei ne le mriste lidne bo notci .i gonai lenu skicu le bangrtlingana bau la lojban. na se curmi da (to ca'i ma? toi) ki'u leka na steci la lojban.; gi lenu skicu loi [[jbocre: xaurselfunca gugde ralo pu'e sevzi pajni|xaurselfunca gugde ralo pu'e sevzi pajni]] .e la [[jbocre: Michael Everson aikl.Everson|Michael Everson aikl.Everson]] .e lei [[jbocre: G�del Numbers and Lojban amcu pe la gedel]] cu ji'a na se curmi da -- mi'e [[User:Nick Nicholas|nitcion]]


*:.i mi ji'a morji lo se du'u zo'e .e'a cusku loi lojbo steci pe bau lo glico .e ro da pe bau la .lojban. kei ne lo mriste lidne bo notci .i gonai lenu skicu lo bantuluxe bau la lojban. na se curmi da (to ca'i ma? toi) ki'u lo ka na steci la .lojban.; gi lenu skicu loi [[jbocre: xaurselfunca gugde|sralo pu'e sevzi pajni]] .e la [[User:Michael Everson|.maikl.everson.]] .e lei [[jbocre: Gödel Numbers and Lojban|namcu pe la gedel]] cu ji'a na se curmi da
----
----
.i ko jmive pe clani be temci .ije ko se prali
.i ko jmive pe clani be temci .ije ko se prali
* ''I'm having trouble parsing this, is it grammatically correct?'' --ColinWright
* ''I'm having trouble parsing this, is it grammatically correct?'' --ColinWright
* No, it isn't.  ''pe'' has to link sumti with a term (more or less), not a selbri with a selbri. It's an attempt at "Live long and prosper," I presume, which might be ''ko ze'u jmive gi'e se prali'' (I don't much like ''se prali'' for "prosper" though). It's probably pretty poor as a command; likely better as ''.a'o do ze'u jmive...'' --mi'e mark
* No, it isn't.  ''pe'' has to link sumti with a term (more or less), not a selbri with a selbri. It's an attempt at "Live long and prosper," I presume, which might be ''ko ze'u jmive gi'e se prali'' (I don't much like ''se prali'' for "prosper" though). It's probably pretty poor as a command; likely better as ''.a'o do ze'u jmive...'' --mi'e mark
Line 25: Line 19:
----
----


[[jbocre: .kreig.daniyl.|.kreig.daniyl.]] disagree with the transliteration of ''tlhIngan'', but I will not detract from the discussion of the language I will give my reasons [[jbocre: Transliterating 'tlhIngan' heir own page|Transliterating 'tlhIngan' heir own page]]
[[jbocre: .kreig.daniyl.|.kreig.daniyl.]] disagrees with the transliteration of ''tlhIngan'', but I will not detract from the discussion of the language I will give my reasons [[jbocre: transliterating 'tlhIngan'|their own page]].

Revision as of 10:42, 21 March 2014

.i lo bangrtlingana no'u la klingon. je no'u la bantuluxe cu runti bangu .i se finti la'ogy.Marc Okrand.gy. noi bauskepre ku'o mu'i tu'a lo ranmi pe la .star.trek. .i lo datni cu zvati zoi gy.www.kli.org.gy.

ni'o la .nitcion. .e la .mark. cu ge lojbo gi se bantuluxe

.i ko ji'a tcidu zo'e ne la la .lojban. je lo bantuluxe

Questions

  • Ahem. Do the Klingons mention Lojban on their Wiki?
    • Inasmuch as they don't have a Wiki, the question is meaningless. Lojban is certainly mentioned on their mailinglist, by persons other than me and Mark, and not with universal derision. And you may be delighted to see [1].
  • nitcion:
  • .i mi ji'a morji lo se du'u zo'e .e'a cusku loi lojbo steci pe bau lo glico .e ro da pe bau la .lojban. kei ne lo mriste lidne bo notci .i gonai lenu skicu lo bantuluxe bau la lojban. na se curmi da (to ca'i ma? toi) ki'u lo ka na steci la .lojban.; gi lenu skicu loi sralo pu'e sevzi pajni .e la .maikl.everson. .e lei namcu pe la gedel cu ji'a na se curmi da

.i ko jmive pe clani be temci .ije ko se prali

  • I'm having trouble parsing this, is it grammatically correct? --ColinWright
  • No, it isn't. pe has to link sumti with a term (more or less), not a selbri with a selbri. It's an attempt at "Live long and prosper," I presume, which might be ko ze'u jmive gi'e se prali (I don't much like se prali for "prosper" though). It's probably pretty poor as a command; likely better as .a'o do ze'u jmive... --mi'e mark
  • Ah. I use either ko ze'u jmive gi'e snada or ze'uku ko jmive gi'e snada, depending on how I'm feeling. Should we remove this exchange and edit the above to something better? --ColinWright

.kreig.daniyl. disagrees with the transliteration of tlhIngan, but I will not detract from the discussion of the language I will give my reasons their own page.