BPFK working page Opinions regarding attitudinals: Difference between revisions
mNo edit summary |
|||
(4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
As an aid to sort out our differences regarding [[BPFK Section: Irrealis Attitudinals]], and possibly to guide further work on the Attitudinals checkpoint, the relevant issues are recorded here. | |||
As an aid to sort out our differences regarding [[BPFK Section: Irrealis | |||
Feel free to edit, but to keep the page manageable, we prefer that you only edit the paragraphs related to ''your own'' opinions. Thank you. | Feel free to edit, but to keep the page manageable, we prefer that you only edit the paragraphs related to ''your own'' opinions. Thank you. | ||
== Veto issues == | == Veto issues == | ||
=== Backwards-compatibility === | === Backwards-compatibility === | ||
The connection between '''ai nai''' and the keyword "refusal" is too entrenched in usage to depart from. | |||
The connection between | *Arnt Richard | ||
* Arnt Richard | |||
=== No redundancy between scalar negation of attitudinal and bridi negation === | === No redundancy between scalar negation of attitudinal and bridi negation === | ||
'''ai nai''' cannot impart the same meaning on a sentence as that of '''ai''' on the negation of that sentence, i.e. '''ai nai broda''' != '''ai na broda''' | |||
*Robin | *Robin | ||
*Ted | *Ted | ||
== Non-veto issues == | == Non-veto issues == | ||
=== Abolition of irrealis === | === Abolition of irrealis === | ||
There should be no irrealis attitudinals. | There should be no irrealis attitudinals. | ||
*Ted | *Ted | ||
=== [[ | === [[ralju brivla deep structure|Gismu deep structure]] in attitudinals === | ||
Nothing should be expressible as attitudinals that are not also expressible as bridis. | Nothing should be expressible as attitudinals that are not also expressible as bridis. | ||
*Ted | *Ted | ||
=== Systematicity === | === Systematicity === | ||
The opposites of the attitudinals are part of a system, from which the current definition of {ai nai}, {e'o nai} and {e'o cu'i} deviates. | The opposites of the attitudinals are part of a system, from which the current definition of {ai nai}, {e'o nai} and {e'o cu'i} deviates. | ||
*Jorge | *Jorge | ||
=== Completeness === | === Completeness === | ||
It is inconvenient that there is no attitudinal for "accidental". | It is inconvenient that there is no attitudinal for "accidental". | ||
*Jorge | *Jorge |
Latest revision as of 15:09, 23 December 2014
As an aid to sort out our differences regarding BPFK Section: Irrealis Attitudinals, and possibly to guide further work on the Attitudinals checkpoint, the relevant issues are recorded here.
Feel free to edit, but to keep the page manageable, we prefer that you only edit the paragraphs related to your own opinions. Thank you.
Veto issues
Backwards-compatibility
The connection between ai nai and the keyword "refusal" is too entrenched in usage to depart from.
- Arnt Richard
No redundancy between scalar negation of attitudinal and bridi negation
ai nai cannot impart the same meaning on a sentence as that of ai on the negation of that sentence, i.e. ai nai broda != ai na broda
- Robin
- Ted
Non-veto issues
Abolition of irrealis
There should be no irrealis attitudinals.
- Ted
Gismu deep structure in attitudinals
Nothing should be expressible as attitudinals that are not also expressible as bridis.
- Ted
Systematicity
The opposites of the attitudinals are part of a system, from which the current definition of {ai nai}, {e'o nai} and {e'o cu'i} deviates.
- Jorge
Completeness
It is inconvenient that there is no attitudinal for "accidental".
- Jorge