BPFK gismu Proposal: gletu: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (Conversion script moved page BPFK gismu Proposal: gletu to bPFK gismu Proposal: gletu: Converting page titles to lowercase)
m (Gleki moved page bPFK gismu Proposal: gletu to BPFK gismu Proposal: gletu over a redirect without leaving a redirect: Text replace - "bPFK" to "BPFK")
Latest revision as of 12:15, 2 July 2014
During a (lengthy) conversation on IRC on October 2nd, 2007, the following issues with gletu were determined:
- The restriction to two parties is unnecessary.
- This is an issue common to many other gismu (penmi, jorne, kansa, tunba, simsa, dunli, frica, ...). One way to deal with it is with -si'u. glesi'u: x1 (group) have sex together.
- The note about x1 and x2 being symmetrical should be adjusted to something like "active partner unspecified" to allow for words that build from gletu for acts that are asymmetrical in nature.
- It only means that if A gletu B, then B gletu A. It doesn't mean that if A brodygletu B, then B brodygletu A, or that if A glebroda B, then B glebroda A. A gismu meaning x1 does to x2 action x3, where x1 is the agent and x2 the patient for any action would be useful though.