BPFK To-Do: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(jai frili fai ma) |
(Adding a bunch of topics I had collected) |
||
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
** {fi do vecnu ti} | ** {fi do vecnu ti} | ||
** {jai frili fai ma} | ** {jai frili fai ma} | ||
** {mi broda fa do} | |||
* Improve the BPFK definition for {ji'i} (see [https://groups.google.com/d/msg/lojban/XXO1L7zKGQE/VpgQ9JUfHBMJ this related discussion]) | * Improve the BPFK definition for {ji'i} (see [https://groups.google.com/d/msg/lojban/XXO1L7zKGQE/VpgQ9JUfHBMJ this related discussion]) | ||
* Go through the gismu list and improve wordings as well as increase consistency between gismu where possible. Go through gismu errata list. | |||
** "at location" places in many gismu seem totally irrelevant to the relation. e.g. ckule, cange, malsi ... Should they be removed? | |||
* Decide how to fill "by standard" places | |||
* Formalize the tense system | |||
* Formalize fi'o and BAI. Currently they are all broken and terrible. Some BAI might need to be killed or heavily redefined to make sense / be useful. for fi'o there are two options... there are infinitely many predicates, so it's simply not possible to define interaction of fi'o with every predicate seperately. therefore i propose to use a single formula that works for all fi'o clauses. BAI can be considered special in that they are more precisely defined and don't need this general solution. (bau = fi'o se baupli). this means that the fi'o transformation of tags is but an approximation, not a full equivalence. co'e only word that is general enough | |||
* Type discussion. mono- vs polymorphism | |||
* Lojban definitions of every cmavo | |||
* Consider experimental gismu to be made official (e.g. kanpe, kibro, etc) | |||
* Consider proposed cmavo and see if they warrant an official form | |||
* CAhA as sumtcita | |||
* subjunctivity formalization | |||
* position ne inner rel is outer with LE, but inner (part of name) with LA. is this desirable? (what if LE-LA merge goes through, still desirable?) | |||
* scope of NA | |||
* na'e ko'a | |||
* make the PEG the official grammar. | |||
* add uy and iy as BY | |||
* add a new FAhA that means "along a path". I suggest {pu'a} from {pluta} (ditch the {pluka} BAI). {mi cadzu pu'a lo rirxe}. {pu'a} has almost no usage (8 times and only on IRC) | |||
* discuss the jvojva | |||
* Have a discussion about the status of dialects. | |||
Review change proposals | |||
* [http://selpahi.weebly.com/lojban/how-to-substantially-simplify-the-lojban-connective-system-my-connective-system Simplified connectives] | |||
* [http://mw.lojban.org/papri/new_soi soi] | |||
* [http://mw.lojban.org/papri/new_voi voi] | |||
* abolition of rafsi assignments [http://selpahi.weebly.com/lojban/how-to-get-rid-of-formal-rafsi] | |||
* cmevla-brivla merge |
Revision as of 19:24, 24 May 2015
This is basically a free-form list of things the BPFK will eventually have to deal with, sooner or later. Feel free to add to it.
- Work through Issues with checkpointed BPFK sections and resolve everything.
- At some point, the BPFK will need to approve the changes in CLL, aka Reference Grammar, Errata, as the CLL is part of the baseline. -rlpowell
- la camgusmis:
- The English word for xagri is 'reed', which is amazingly dumb. It needs to be changed to 'reed instrument' or 'woodwind' or something.
- xorxes:
- Consider the grammar proposals listed in zasni gerna cenba vreji
- Grammar points to be decided upon
- {ti citka be mi}
- {lo nu brode ba brodo}
- {fi do vecnu ti}
- {jai frili fai ma}
- {mi broda fa do}
- Improve the BPFK definition for {ji'i} (see this related discussion)
- Go through the gismu list and improve wordings as well as increase consistency between gismu where possible. Go through gismu errata list.
- "at location" places in many gismu seem totally irrelevant to the relation. e.g. ckule, cange, malsi ... Should they be removed?
- Decide how to fill "by standard" places
- Formalize the tense system
- Formalize fi'o and BAI. Currently they are all broken and terrible. Some BAI might need to be killed or heavily redefined to make sense / be useful. for fi'o there are two options... there are infinitely many predicates, so it's simply not possible to define interaction of fi'o with every predicate seperately. therefore i propose to use a single formula that works for all fi'o clauses. BAI can be considered special in that they are more precisely defined and don't need this general solution. (bau = fi'o se baupli). this means that the fi'o transformation of tags is but an approximation, not a full equivalence. co'e only word that is general enough
- Type discussion. mono- vs polymorphism
- Lojban definitions of every cmavo
- Consider experimental gismu to be made official (e.g. kanpe, kibro, etc)
- Consider proposed cmavo and see if they warrant an official form
- CAhA as sumtcita
- subjunctivity formalization
- position ne inner rel is outer with LE, but inner (part of name) with LA. is this desirable? (what if LE-LA merge goes through, still desirable?)
- scope of NA
- na'e ko'a
- make the PEG the official grammar.
- add uy and iy as BY
- add a new FAhA that means "along a path". I suggest {pu'a} from {pluta} (ditch the {pluka} BAI). {mi cadzu pu'a lo rirxe}. {pu'a} has almost no usage (8 times and only on IRC)
- discuss the jvojva
- Have a discussion about the status of dialects.
Review change proposals
- Simplified connectives
- soi
- voi
- abolition of rafsi assignments [1]
- cmevla-brivla merge