Anglan: Difference between revisions

From Lojban
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (Gleki moved page jbocre: Anglan to Anglan without leaving a redirect: Text replace - "jbocre: A" to "A")
No edit summary
 
(5 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
A proposed reform of Lojban that keeps surfacing from different people at different times under different names. Its core is "Why not base the gismu on just one language (which turns out in practice to be English) so people can learn them more easily?"
 
A proposed reform of Lojban that keeps surfacing from different people at different times under different names. Its core is "Why not base the gismu on just one language [[jbocre: which turns out in practice to be English|which turns out in practice to be English]] so people can learn them more easily?"


The classic rebuttal is "Using English words imports the semantics of English, which doesn't match Lojban [[place structure|place structure]] semantics."
The classic rebuttal is "Using English words imports the semantics of English, which doesn't match Lojban [[place structure|place structure]] semantics."


Here are some examples:
Discussions:
 
* "[http://www.lojban.org/files/why-lojban/whylojb.txt Why Lojban]", 1988 (search "Jeffrey Kegler")
* [http://www.lojban.org/files/why-lojban/whylojb.txt] (search "Jeffrey Kegler"), 1988
* "[http://www.goertzel.org/new_research/Loglish.htm Loglish]", 2005 (also discussed on the mailing list in "[http://mail.lojban.org/lists/lojban-list/msg10286.html Loglish: A Modest Proposal]")
* [http://www.goertzel.org/new_research/Loglish.htm] (discussed on the mailing list [http://mail.lojban.org/lists/lojban-list/msg10286.html here]), 2005
* [http://mail.lojban.org/lists/lojban-list/msg36242.html Gismu with 100% english bias], 2012
 
[[Category: mupli lo bangu]]
* [http://mail.lojban.org/lists/lojban-list/msg36242.html], 2012

Latest revision as of 06:06, 6 September 2015

A proposed reform of Lojban that keeps surfacing from different people at different times under different names. Its core is "Why not base the gismu on just one language (which turns out in practice to be English) so people can learn them more easily?"

The classic rebuttal is "Using English words imports the semantics of English, which doesn't match Lojban place structure semantics."

Discussions: