Anglan: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
(8 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
A proposed reform of Lojban that keeps surfacing from different people at different times under different names. Its core is "Why not base the gismu on just one language (which turns out in practice to be English) so people can learn them more easily?" | |||
The classic rebuttal is "Using English words imports the semantics of English, which doesn't match Lojban [[place structure|place structure]] semantics." | |||
Discussions: | |||
* | * "[http://www.lojban.org/files/why-lojban/whylojb.txt Why Lojban]", 1988 (search "Jeffrey Kegler") | ||
* "[http://www.goertzel.org/new_research/Loglish.htm Loglish]", 2005 (also discussed on the mailing list in "[http://mail.lojban.org/lists/lojban-list/msg10286.html Loglish: A Modest Proposal]") | |||
* | * [http://mail.lojban.org/lists/lojban-list/msg36242.html Gismu with 100% english bias], 2012 | ||
[[Category: mupli lo bangu]] |
Latest revision as of 06:06, 6 September 2015
A proposed reform of Lojban that keeps surfacing from different people at different times under different names. Its core is "Why not base the gismu on just one language (which turns out in practice to be English) so people can learn them more easily?"
The classic rebuttal is "Using English words imports the semantics of English, which doesn't match Lojban place structure semantics."
Discussions:
- "Why Lojban", 1988 (search "Jeffrey Kegler")
- "Loglish", 2005 (also discussed on the mailing list in "Loglish: A Modest Proposal")
- Gismu with 100% english bias, 2012