role-playing Games: Difference between revisions

From Lojban
Jump to navigation Jump to search
mNo edit summary
 
m (Conversion script moved page Role-playing Games to role-playing Games: Converting page titles to lowercase)
 
(5 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:


[http://www.fa-kuan.muc.de/yangliu.gif]
* [[lojbo munje|lojbo munje]]


Reply to Li Shuyi
Would any Lojbanists be remotely interested in the idea of carrying on a play by email role playing game, in Lojban?


Verlor meine stolze Pappel, verlorst deine Weide;
''What game system? If it's White Wolf (the only one I know) then I (la [[.kreig.daniyl.|.kreig.daniyl.]]) would be interested. Other systems I can maybe pick up enough of, since PBEM tends not to be very rules-intensive.''


o Yang, o Liu: leicht aufgeflogen zu Neunten Himmeln.
It would surely be open to discussion. I'm familiar with AD 2nd Ed, Shadowrun, and Battletech. Just picked up WW's V:tM book out of curiousity. Interesting things could be done with making the game focus on creative use of language and narration (all in Lojban), IMO. --[[Jay Kominek|Jay]]


Befragen, verh�ren Wu Kang, was er da habe,
I would certainly be interested. I would recommend using Fudge; It is very


und Wu Kang reicht ihn entgegen, Zimtbl�tenwein.
flexible and mechanics light. (and its free). The author has a site:


Vereinsamte Ch'ang O, breitet die weiten �rmel,
http://www.panix.com/~sos/fudge.html


in zehntausend Meilen des Raums f�r die treuen Seelen
My attraction to white wolf is that it allows for much more versatile magic than any other RPG system (my favorite of their games is mage); and they have a very realistic setting, even for fantasy gaming. Lojbanically, werewolf might be interesting - try thinking up names for all the changing breeds!


zu tanzen.
If you want, I can translate character sheets, but they won't look good since I don't have acrobat.


Die pl�tzliche Nachricht: auf Erden ergab sich der Tiger;
Fudge looks interesting; although we would all have to learn the rules, it looks easy. My favorite is still WW (especially but not exclusively Mage), but I'm willing to try out others. - la [[.kreig.daniyl.|.kreig.daniyl.]]


in Tr�nen brechen sie aus, wie Str�me von Regen.
Well, I think that the way this will have to operate is: Someone volunteers to be the GM. They pick the system and see if they can get enough people together. If they can't get enough people for a given system, they choose a different one, or give up and let someone else to GM for a different system. I'm not volunteering to GM, merely to play. :) (And I'll do any of the systems mentioned up to this point on the page, plus anything else the GM feels I'd be competent enough to play.) Fudge has a number of bonus points going for it in that we could, if motivated, translate the whole shabang into Lojban, and be completely legally safe. --[[Jay Kominek|Jay]]


(Joachim Schickel)
A bit more about Fudge:


I lost my proud poplar, you lost your willow;
The center piece of the game is the rating system they use.


o Yang, o Liu: gently soared up to Ninth Heavens.
It is a scale from 'Superb' to 'Terrible':


Questioned, interrogated Wu Kang, what's there to give,
* Superb (+3)
* Great  (+2)


and Wu Kang offering them: fragrant-blossom wine.
* Good  (+1)
* Fair  (+0)


Ch'ang O in seclusion, spreads her long sleeves in space
* Mediocre (-1)
* Poor  (-2)


of ten thousand miles, to dance for the faithful souls.
* Terrible (-3)


The sudden news then: on earth, the tiger was to surrender;
Translating that scale into Lojban without getting redundant (or silly)


and they burst out crying, with tears pouring like rain.
might be a challenge. Here is a PDF of the


(tr. A.W. Tueting)
[http://www.fudgerpg.com/files/pdf/fudge_1995.pdf ull rules]. And here is a brief [http://www.fudgerpg.com/files/pdf/fudge_nutshell.pdf verview].


BTW, here's still another "poetico-botanical" problem:
Ho! When I see a scale of seven value terms, I reach for my ''cai, sai, ru'e, cu'i, ru'enai, sainai, cainai''. --[[John Cowan|John Cowan]]


kuei hua chiu/gui4hua1jiu3/gueyhuajeou:
What a great idea! I think that just might work.


How to translate this?? - "laurel brew", "fragrant-blossom wine" etc.
----
 
What about [http://www.mimgames.com/window/ he Window]?  This system appears to be much more free-form, and places more emphasis on the development of the story rather than the mechanics of hack-n-slash. I personally have never played according to this system before, but it looks interesting.  --kc5tja
 
(Keep going with the discussion here)
 
----


In this compound (gui hua), the word gui does not have the meaning of "cassia" ( nor
Ok, lets try an informal poll of what systems people would be interested in. Below is a list of systems. Everybody can rank 3 systems from most favorite to least favorite to play. The one you want to play most, you stick a 3 next to. The one you want to play least, stick a 1 next to. (The one in the middle gets a 2). Then, in the parentheses next to the name of the system, place the sum of all the votes, and if you're really daring, resort them so they're ranked. :)


"cinnamon" as given in the German version), but that of "osmanthus fragrans" or "olea
* Fudge (9) 2 3 3 1
* White Wolf, World of Darkness (8) 2 3 3


fragrans" (in German: Duftbl�tenstrauch/fragrant-blossom-shrub) usually used for flavouring teas.
* Shadowrun (6) 3 1 2
* D&D 3rd Edition/D20 (5) 2 3


But, if trying to be correct *botanically*, the original's reference to the Chinese Sisyphos
* AD&D (5) 1 2 2
* GURPS (4) 1 2 1


(the man in the moon cutting the Kuei-tree over and over again) is getting lost! Yet, also
* Heroes Unlimited (3) 3
* Champions/Hero System (2) 2


Mao's reference already seems to be wrong: but not according to Wolfgang Eberhard who states that the
* Battletech/Mechwarrior
* Call of Cthulhu


cinnamon-tree/cassia-tree (gui) and their blossoms (gui hua) *are* "osmanthus fragrans"! Any
* Rifts
* Warhammer


help? --.aulun.
* [http://www.mimgames.com/window/ he Window] (3) 3


----
If I left your favorite off the list, then by all means, add it, (but only if you're going to vote for it, no sense in a bunch of empty things on the list.) --[[Jay Kominek|Jay]]

Latest revision as of 08:34, 30 June 2014

Would any Lojbanists be remotely interested in the idea of carrying on a play by email role playing game, in Lojban?

What game system? If it's White Wolf (the only one I know) then I (la .kreig.daniyl.) would be interested. Other systems I can maybe pick up enough of, since PBEM tends not to be very rules-intensive.

It would surely be open to discussion. I'm familiar with AD 2nd Ed, Shadowrun, and Battletech. Just picked up WW's V:tM book out of curiousity. Interesting things could be done with making the game focus on creative use of language and narration (all in Lojban), IMO. --Jay

I would certainly be interested. I would recommend using Fudge; It is very

flexible and mechanics light. (and its free). The author has a site:

http://www.panix.com/~sos/fudge.html

My attraction to white wolf is that it allows for much more versatile magic than any other RPG system (my favorite of their games is mage); and they have a very realistic setting, even for fantasy gaming. Lojbanically, werewolf might be interesting - try thinking up names for all the changing breeds!

If you want, I can translate character sheets, but they won't look good since I don't have acrobat.

Fudge looks interesting; although we would all have to learn the rules, it looks easy. My favorite is still WW (especially but not exclusively Mage), but I'm willing to try out others. - la .kreig.daniyl.

Well, I think that the way this will have to operate is: Someone volunteers to be the GM. They pick the system and see if they can get enough people together. If they can't get enough people for a given system, they choose a different one, or give up and let someone else to GM for a different system. I'm not volunteering to GM, merely to play. :) (And I'll do any of the systems mentioned up to this point on the page, plus anything else the GM feels I'd be competent enough to play.) Fudge has a number of bonus points going for it in that we could, if motivated, translate the whole shabang into Lojban, and be completely legally safe. --Jay

A bit more about Fudge:

The center piece of the game is the rating system they use.

It is a scale from 'Superb' to 'Terrible':

  • Superb (+3)
  • Great (+2)
  • Good (+1)
  • Fair (+0)
  • Mediocre (-1)
  • Poor (-2)
  • Terrible (-3)

Translating that scale into Lojban without getting redundant (or silly)

might be a challenge. Here is a PDF of the

ull rules. And here is a brief verview.

Ho! When I see a scale of seven value terms, I reach for my cai, sai, ru'e, cu'i, ru'enai, sainai, cainai. --John Cowan

What a great idea! I think that just might work.


What about he Window? This system appears to be much more free-form, and places more emphasis on the development of the story rather than the mechanics of hack-n-slash. I personally have never played according to this system before, but it looks interesting. --kc5tja

(Keep going with the discussion here)


Ok, lets try an informal poll of what systems people would be interested in. Below is a list of systems. Everybody can rank 3 systems from most favorite to least favorite to play. The one you want to play most, you stick a 3 next to. The one you want to play least, stick a 1 next to. (The one in the middle gets a 2). Then, in the parentheses next to the name of the system, place the sum of all the votes, and if you're really daring, resort them so they're ranked. :)

  • Fudge (9) 2 3 3 1
  • White Wolf, World of Darkness (8) 2 3 3
  • Shadowrun (6) 3 1 2
  • D&D 3rd Edition/D20 (5) 2 3
  • AD&D (5) 1 2 2
  • GURPS (4) 1 2 1
  • Heroes Unlimited (3) 3
  • Champions/Hero System (2) 2
  • Battletech/Mechwarrior
  • Call of Cthulhu
  • Rifts
  • Warhammer

If I left your favorite off the list, then by all means, add it, (but only if you're going to vote for it, no sense in a bunch of empty things on the list.) --Jay